|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
DrZeeLit
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:00 PM Original message |
Question: why not one vote - up/down - waterboarding is torture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because that would piss off the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sorry, but I smell a RW talking point with this one. It isn't necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. And we called it a war crime when the Japanese did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. The Viet Cong and the Chinese also drank tea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Apples=oranges? I think not. That we have to debate that suffocation torture is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Then torture will continue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. So is it OK if I cut people's head of with a machete? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Those both fall under definitions of murder, which are extremely explicit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. So does torture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Again, torture requires an agreed-upon definition of "unreasonable" or "excessive." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. We don't need to "legislate" every FORM of torture, there is no equivocation on the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Exactly. Definitions of torture are purposely kept vague |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. It's illegal to drive drunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Not only that, it will give bush legal cover to say "well, it wasn't illegal when I did it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. A better analogy is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Yeah, but you still don't have to list those substances, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. In most laws, they generally do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Really? Quote them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. they also all ate rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kennedy introduced a bill in August-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazyriver
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
8. Even if they don't pass a law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. cojones nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. Then what happens if it passes and Bush vetoes it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Make it clear in the wording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Why would one formally re-iterate a law that is already the law.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Because the current Executive does not officially believe it is the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. LOL, because they don't believe it is the law does NOT change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. It would certainly put the Mukasey wordplay to rest. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Tue Nov-06-07 02:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Not confirming him would do that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC