KUCINICH CALLED BACK UP theRESOLUTION-NOW HOYER MOVED TO TABLE
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:32 PM
Original message |
KUCINICH CALLED BACK UP theRESOLUTION-NOW HOYER MOVED TO TABLE |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 02:59 PM by Blackhatjack
|
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It is being read by the Clerk.... |
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I wonder if Kucinich is pushing the Chair to set a time for vote ... |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
MelissaB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Keep those calls coming in. |
Vadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I heard the clerk say something about sending the bill to Senate... |
|
or will there be a vote on it now?
:bounce:
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
27. The only thing the Senate does on impeachments is acquit or convict |
|
They have no say in how or whether the impeachment process gets started.
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Thanks for the heads up!! -- C-Span LINK.... |
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
12. What does that mean? Am I correct in thinking that Dennis presented |
|
his resolution already? Then what happens/happened?
Who's this woman speaking now?
|
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. YES!!!! Just a few minutes ago..this is the second reading!! |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 02:43 PM by Breeze54
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
26. Thanks for this link! nt |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
20. This is the Clerk reading the impeachment resolution into the record... |
|
Kucinich already was recognized for a point of personal privilege and read the entire resolution when he brought it to the floor.
THe presiding CHair read the rule that it would be scheduled for vote within 2 legislative days.
(There may be a requirement that the resolution be read into the record twice before the vote can be held, but I am not sure on this one.)
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. Okay thanks. I listened to Dennis so couldn't figure out what was going on |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Here is a LINK to a DU thread setting out House Rule IX governing this... |
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
WA98296
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Kucinich is DOING what WE want, and trying to save the Constitution. If YOU |
|
haven't called your rep yet, then shame on you!
We just called Jay Inslee, Speaker Pelosi, and then followed up with a HUGE thanks to Rep. Kucinich.
|
FourScore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I am supporting this with phone calls and prayers, |
|
but somehow I can't help but think it is all moot with the spineless leadership we have in Congress right now.
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I've got it on now. I appreciate the heads up!
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
19. CUBE RATS DEMAND SPECIFICS!!! |
|
why is he recalling the resolution???
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
21. i will share my ignorance...who is this speaking? |
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
Trouser Trout
(326 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
25. I keep running back to my computer in between seeing patients |
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
30. Misleading Congress and the American people |
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
28. God, those words are more beautiful each time I hear them! |
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It doesn't matter if this is as far as it gets--it's on record that they have done impeachable things! CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
:woohoo: rocknation
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. wasn't it on the record when Dennis read it? why is she reading it again? |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
33. MOTION TO TABLE -- BY HOYER, KUCINICH Moved For Recorded Vote |
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
35. BOOOOOOO! It appears to have passed. |
|
Now in electronic vote. Creeps!
|
antigop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. Hoyer NEEDS TO GO! n/t |
cal04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
32. thank you Blackhatjack for the heads up |
|
just coming home from work :kick:
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
34. beautiful, the DEMOCRATIC house speaker voted to table it. |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 02:57 PM by spanone
I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT FUCKING PARTY I BELONG TO
|
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
38. Can you believe the Dems stopped this |
|
its truly sad and reality is Democrats and Republicans are just one pary
Our government is totally failed
|
cal04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
42. The DLC MEMBER (house speaker) voted to table it. |
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
37. m fing hoyer motions to table. How dare a democrat do that? |
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Ed Schultz just mentioned it in the record |
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
49. I wonder if the Media hasn't reported because they got the word from Hoyers that he |
|
would Table the motion. I'm always amazed at how the Repugs get coverage and have gotten coverage and yet there's almost a quiet when Dems do anything out of step with Hoyer/Pelosi or Reid's wishes. Like the media is alerted ahead of time to downplay the coverage because whatever it is won't go anywhere.
|
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Hate to Say IT -- But 8 Dems Voted TO TABLE So Far --NOT Looking Good |
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
43. We know it will go down....but, hope he asks for the names of those voting |
|
also for the record. I wonder how many times he can bring up this Resolution. Is it just once or could he do it again..when the situation worsens with Cheney...which we know it will. :shrug:
|
Trouser Trout
(326 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
44. Why, for once, can't Dems vote in lockstep like the Repubs Do? |
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
45. Now it's 17 Yes, 11, no |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
46. DEMs Voting to TABLE are 22 at this time |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
47. So this was Hoyer's parliamentary move -- to skip the 2 days and |
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
50. At least he's gotten it in the record and will get to give a press conference... |
|
It will be interesting to see if Tweety or any others cover it besides Olbermann tonight. And, HOW MSM will cover it if they do. Will it be ignored by the RW'ers over at Fox...or covered with snickering and derision. :shrug:
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
51. deceased...i'd like to thank my party for obstructing impeachment proceedings |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
52. DEMS voting to TABLE now number 100 |
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
53. Repugs are changing votes NOT to Table..... Amazing! |
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
54. Because they think it will embarrass the Dems |
|
to actually go through the entire vote. Then, they can scream "see how looney those mean Democrats are giving in to the MoveOn, George Soros pinko-commie types"
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-06-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
55. What is going on here....the Nays are now winning with Repugs all switching! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.