|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:23 PM Original message |
Impeach Cheney! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Do we want it sent to a committee or do we want an open discussion? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. WaterPeople? Meaning your guys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. There are a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Per Matthews, it's dead in the Judiciary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Mike Viquera Said That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. But the Judiciary Committee already had an impeachment resolution before it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
62. Here is what the Judiciary Committee website says. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
63. Matthews is such a tool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed-up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. and then BUSH-thank-you Dennis!!!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. This is a large step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #34 |
57. Check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. They just voted to do just that.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. This is good news. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. A quick look at the members of the Judiciary Committee. It seems good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. There are conflicting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Well, I just got news within one minute of the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. we're hoping so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 01:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. More Dems falling in line... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. First Richard B. Cheney, then George Walker Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Please call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. Yes, and just as I called yesterday and today-tommorrow John Conyers and others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. The voters did know about Kucinich's resolution until today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
41. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. Thank God/Goddess. I don't really understand what is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. They tend to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. That is the important thing but members can't be bullied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Will They Call Fitzgerald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes! This Has Now Become A MASSIVE Story! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
40. And it will! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. Albert...that's the guys name that got Inhofe off the hook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
16. You can tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. Cheney's Approval Rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Doing the DearAbby OKIE DOKIE DANCE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
21. thank you again H20 Man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. It's a big step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Just what I have been wanting to read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
31. i've been looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. There was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
53. That was one of my thoughts...few people thought it would get that far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlowDownFast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
36. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
37. Oh, you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
38. Thank You H2O Man. You Have Kept the Faith Alive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
39. I heard that the pugs voted for it in an effort to embarrass the dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
42. Maybe this Rethug attempt to embarrass Dems will have unanticipated blowback. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
43. STAWPIT!!!! Don't be stupid. BE REAL! Cheney is the "puppeteer" over our,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yoyossarian (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Puppeteer indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hell Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
45. What I want to know is whether the Judiciary Comm. has the authority to hire a special prosecutor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. They really don't need to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Yes, but you know the public wants to hear the other "I" word... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. If there was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
46. Why would we want it sent back to Committee where it will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Exactly. Thank you. BEEN THERE DONE THAT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. NO !!! - Of Course Not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
55. I was thinking the committee would need funds and people. Is that what we should push for? Or should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
56. Cheney first! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 06:04 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Cheney first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
59. Proud to give the 50th R and here's a kick for the hope that came |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
60. Error: You've already recommended that thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Sep 22nd 2024, 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC