|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:50 PM Original message |
Is Impeachment really DEAD in Conyers committee ? Say it ain't so ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. We don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. it wasn't long ago DU was all about Conyers, his picture was avatars for many posters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Write him a letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not dead -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. It's about time we tackled prisoner re-entry and court security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I think that's more of an "in your face!" (taunt) than declaration of intent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. It is not dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Probably. The MSM covered this for about a minute today. Now, it's a footnote in their blogs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Only if you choose to not do a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. stalled more like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ImpeechBush (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. Wasn't Conyers the one holding the simulated impeachment hearings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutineer (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. It was all a farce. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. I prefer to think of it as hibernating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. To me, he should go ahead . Use the republican vote as cover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. I don't think so. Don't forget that Dennis can always use the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. A majority of the House must sign a discharge order for it to get out of committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. The Republicans voted NOT to table it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. Some people here would like it to be dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. that you have very right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. Didn't someone post that Conyers was for impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
21. Conyers was all talk, when faced with the reality of impeachment he crawls away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Horay Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Sep 22nd 2024, 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC