|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NYVet (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:13 AM Original message |
Obscure doctrine gives former judge part of Boulder neighbors' land |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. Pretty Shocking stuff... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeNearMcChord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. If this stuff spreads, we will start seeing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. it sounds like a lousy decision but there's nothing at all obscure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYVet (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I am willing to be that a majority of DUers have never heard of that term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I meant it's not legally obscure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYVet (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. And that is the point of the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. no. the article called it an obscure legal doctrine. It's not even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. It's not so obscure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernsoul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. It's taught to every first-year law student |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. No, it's not that obscure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. No, there really isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpbrown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Exactly - walking on it could lead to prescriptive easement but not adverse possession |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. This can happen in Florida, BUT only if the person claiming land that belongs to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
7. I think they have to pay for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. Normally a good law, but walking on land is 'use' for purpose of ownership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Yeah, as was pointed out upthread, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-21-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. Why be shocked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Sep 27th 2024, 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC