|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:39 PM Original message |
Rathergate: much more than meets the EYE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. The problem with Rathergate is in the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. The documents were forgeries IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You can't verify a forgery off of a photocopy n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. The documents should not have been in his show if they were unauthenticated faxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Forgeries of original documents as I understand it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. That's how it looks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. He did have support for the CONTENT of the document |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Rather made a bad decision. So did CBS. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 07:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. If they were fake they could EASILY be determined fake. That they could not be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 08:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. That was part of the deal given to CBS. The WH dropped proving the documents fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. The secretary of the TANG commander who generated the original memo said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. absolutely he did! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. She didn't say the details were true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. No, she said the contents of the memo were true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
27. Desperate corporatestooges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bozita
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. Howie Kurtz (WaPo) was ripping Rather today on Russert's MSNBC show. It was over AWOLgate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Howard Kurtz - a background check: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bozita
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That's why I mentioned Kurtz. As long as Rather's breathing, he's a GOP target. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. He's also called Bill Burkett "severely mentally ill..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. cessation of breathing didn't stop the attacks on JFK, RFK, FDR, etc. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Ah, she's interested in 'tort reform', Tobacco, PhRMA and the RNC's biggest racket. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Bin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 04:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
36. Great reply-post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Rather is mad as hell, and he's not going away. And that's good. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. One reason this story just doesn't catch fire is that people will not face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. The truth may be worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. not to mention the DUI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Explanation of 2000: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. * is still a mean drunk and there are videos of it since he was 40: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. I quite agree that he is likely still drinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. And here I always thought the injuries were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. i think that footage is doctored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Doesn't matter. I watched him myself in that Argentina speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
16. Glad this story is still in the news. 60 Minutes was gutted, Rather crucified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. If the documents were forgeries, a White House plot emerges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 04:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
37. Thank you. Scary that there are apparently still DU'er's who didn't know -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
22. Since someone was totally on top of this from the unspeakable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. I'll tell ya what's not "clear".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. The question here is who doctored the documents. It's been established that their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan
![]() |
Sun Nov-25-07 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. More details here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notanotherday
![]() |
Mon Nov-26-07 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
40. I am glad Dan is not going down without a fight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 04:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC