|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:40 AM Original message |
It's official, smoking bans are bad for business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Submariner
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. That was a no-brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dulcinea
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
62. I see nothing wrong with businesses deciding this for themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #62 |
116. it looks like people *are* voting with their feet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #116 |
131. Before the smoking ban here in Illinois I went out for dinner and coffee every evening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #131 |
138. going out for coffee, sitting there smoking, talking, drinking cup after cup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #138 |
159. I really do miss it, particularly this time of year. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKJrNews
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #131 |
152. Smoking bans bad for business in TX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #152 |
154. They pfled with their pfloggers from Pflugerville |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKJrNews
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #154 |
162. While on the subject of righteous hypocrisy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oeditpus Rex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #162 |
174. I've been a fan for about 15 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Too early for beer?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
76. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. Wait a minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Good point. Any way you slice it, smoking is a public health hazard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes it is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. On top everything else we're financing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:12 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Let me get this straight......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Go down to your city finance debt. Ask them to show you the chart of their finances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
78. Sadly this true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:15 PM Response to Reply #78 |
129. And that is called a regressive tax.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #129 |
143. pft! good for you! never playing the lottery! how wonderful you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #143 |
170. Why thank you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #170 |
186. did i say that i smoked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. How long have people known that smoking is dangerous to their health? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
35. Okay then, screw your own health... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
90. Cry me a river about what smoking costs/finances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. I'm not asking for your sympathy, that's not what I was looking for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stranger81
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
74. I'd be happy to do that if the inordinate taxes I already pay on cigarettes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
125. That's fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #125 |
156. That's okay, they eat up more in Medicare and Meidcaid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #156 |
201. I'd like to see the numbers on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:04 PM Original message |
Then let's tax the hell out of your beer and wine while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kajsa
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
195. This is a reply to #10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
196. That would work if those taxes were earmarked and not put in the general fund like here in Md. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Submariner
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. F*ck them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I assuming this is sarcasm? EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
145. think about it. if i didn't smoke and didn't want to be around smoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #145 |
166. You wouldn't become a roofer if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:20 PM Response to Reply #145 |
168. It's not your health that I am worried about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwernimont
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #168 |
192. So I assume that you feel OSHA workplace regulations are good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. What workers that have no choice? Is slavery still legal in this country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Lame arguement.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I don't know about where you live, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
124. And what about the bar employees who DO smoke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TransitJohn
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
165. In my experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
High Plains
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
67. Who doesn't have a choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #67 |
130. So where does this end? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #130 |
171. Oh hell no, just the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #171 |
178. LOL.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #178 |
183. You know that there are children who are allergic to virtually everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
68. Wait a minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
77. They do have a choice. Work there or don't work there. Very simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #77 |
128. Great.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
134. Why do you hate America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
163. Is secondhand smoke a health hazard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #163 |
172. I am not going to click on a "pro-tobacco lobby link"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. Doesn't sound conclusive, to me. The difference may disappear over time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Considering that some of these smoking bans have been in place for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I'll go with "credible." But not "conclusive." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Again, nobody is forcing people to work in a smoking establishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
119. Apply the same logic to all work-related hazards and we wouldn't have OSHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #119 |
181. not neccesarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #181 |
185. The issue though is whether exposure to second hand smoke in a restaurant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
16. So are early closings ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:22 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Why are they forcing bars to close an hour earlier? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. There are "bad bars" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. This has nothing to do with that, but when I lived in Nebraska the closing time was 1 (and still is) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
23. Here's the link, from the horse's mouth so to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:36 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Good for Authoritarianism though! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Some people don't want a free country. They support an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
187. You know why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. And smoking hurts people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
50. I don't have any scientific evidence to back this up but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
25. Finally this is coming out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I wish my country was smoke-free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I don't smoke and I'm highly allergic to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I don't get cold when I walk by someone not wearing a coat... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:06 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. So do I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Some problems require only the attention of the individual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
180. That's all I am sayin as well...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
175. Haha... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Or make a law that lowers emissions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #31 |
54. Keep Wishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
27. Yeah they should also ban alcohol in those places as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
93. We should get rid of those bans on drunk driving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
29. Bars Ignore Smoking Ban Rather Than Lose Customers (Ohio) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
34. So? If business didn't have to enforce OSHA regs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
36. That the first time I have heard that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. See Post #29. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. That just says the bar owners are ignoring the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I Don't Think Anyone Has Stats, Yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. I found this impact statement from the CDC on smoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #48 |
64. I'd rather trust the numbers from the Fed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Can you actually provide any statistics to back up your claims? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
100. I provided the report upthread n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
80. The numbers are NOT from the FED!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. Considering that it came from the St. Louis Fed website, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #101 |
108. They are not the Fed's numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwernimont
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #48 |
194. Speaking of the CDC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
182. well I know that in dc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwernimont
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #36 |
193. Here's a link for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
39. It's not "puritan zeal," it's public health. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #39 |
55. I Have A Question For You About That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I really don't have the time or inclination to reargue this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. I'm Not Arguing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Not being snippy. Just a statement of fact. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Redux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. You're being snippy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Are You Being Willfully Obtuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
High Plains
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #56 |
70. Oh, I think part of does have to do with "puritan morality." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwernimont
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
200. The Nicoderm funded ALA is not a credible source of information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
83. Well, haven't you noticed the plague of stock outages for filtering masks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #83 |
102. I Get Your Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #102 |
120. I've not noticed much in the way of reasonable behavior in any of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #55 |
151. Because the dangerous material is inherently necessary for the business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
41. Dude, just quit. You'll feel better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. bullshit. i quit 7 days ago. dont feel a damn bet better. feel worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
82. I quit 25 days ago....keep going...you WILL feel better...I gave it up after 30 years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #52 |
87. it will get easier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #52 |
89. Give it time, friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #41 |
65. LOL, sure, just don't worry about more businesses going under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncle ray
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. so where are the smokers going then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #72 |
122. Yeah, Pretty Much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mugu
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #72 |
160. Exactly. I don't go where I'm not welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #65 |
92. Don't think about that part of it...be selfish about this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #92 |
104. and they didn't just go up in smoke .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
43. You might want to take a look at this study, which contradicts what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
44. Smoking bans are GREAT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evoman
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
49. Isn't it the same as any business? Businesses that ignore any sort or regulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
51. Bollocks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
53. I smoke but I am all for the bans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
121. Me too...I stepped out of the bar 3 times last night...in -20 below windchills in Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
63. The irony here is crushing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #63 |
81. Excellent point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #81 |
105. There's plenty of hypocrisy on both sides of the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #63 |
97. The irony is indeed crushing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
109. Who goes to a bar and doesn't expect to be around smoke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
66. Big tobacco is laughing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
69. Separate ventilation and patios work fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
73. judging by the crowds that are outside our two late-night bars smoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
75. In order to provide a little more information, since you did not research your post, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
79. MadHound. You might want to do a little research on this Michael Pakko fellow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
103. You're referencing material from Charles Cowger? LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
84. Than I guess San Francisco's thriving... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
85. huh, our bar owners saw an intial drop, but after a little while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
86. If you're waiting for the smoking bans in California to go away, I'd advise you not hold your breath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
88. Yes, money is more important than people's health |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #88 |
94. A couple of things for you to consider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. A lot of people drink less because there are laws against drunk driving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
91. how many of the businesses will go under when the NON-smokers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #91 |
99. Well, considering that before the bans were enacted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
96. If we got rid of all OSHA standards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #96 |
148. OSHA has never regulated workplace smoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #148 |
169. I think you missed my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
106. And when the bars close it hurts the musicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #106 |
112. Who Cares! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. But you say that as if it were a BAD thing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. Oh, Boo Hoo Hoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. Yeah, I do know what cold is - I used to live in N.Ky./Cincinnati area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. See Ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #118 |
135. HA! The last winter I was there, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #106 |
132. When I was in a band... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #132 |
136. That may be true, but you've still got to have a place to play! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #136 |
144. and my point was that we chose NOT to play in smoke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #132 |
149. pffft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #149 |
153. whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #149 |
161. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #161 |
164. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #106 |
139. This musician is thrilled to not have to inhale smoke while I'm singing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
107. Drugs to help people feel better emotionally is a lose - lose proposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabbit of Caerbannog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
110. This in todays local Richmond paper disputes this (except bars in KY): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikus1975
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
111. I live in illinois. The smoking ban just went in this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Where In Illinois, Mikus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #111 |
123. I was in a packed bar in Chicago last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #111 |
126. Hello. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
127. Did people stop flying when airlines went no smoking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
133. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
137. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
140. Did you read the study. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #140 |
150. Ahh, your study had exactly no facts in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #150 |
190. No facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #190 |
197. You are incredibly naive about medical studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper
![]() |
Sun Jan-27-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #197 |
203. Sure, I'm naive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sun Jan-27-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. I'll buy that. One study doesn't prove anything one way or the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
141. here's an article that says the opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
142. Not new news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. lolcat? is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. No nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:32 PM Response to Reply #147 |
155. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
157. Well, that cinches it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheUniverse
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
158. Ever since my state went smoke free a few weeks ago, I really enjoy being able to go in any restuant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
167. I live in a county with one of the strictest smoking bans in the nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
173. YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
176. Smoking tobacco sucks. Anyone that depends on people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
177. His name is spelled Pakko, FYI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChazII
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
179. The do gooders will never admit they were wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Fri Jan-25-08 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
184. Hey, strange thought! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChazII
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #184 |
188. Awesome answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #184 |
191. Umm, I think that if you would go reread my OP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #191 |
198. I didn't write this to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
189. I think the two bars in town are going to close up over it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Essene
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
199. The right solution is... having Smoking Licenses, with heavy regulation, sin taxes and wind tunnels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted
![]() |
Sat Jan-26-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
202. Officially? Fuck business. Clean air is good for everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuushew
![]() |
Sun Jan-27-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
205. Is one economic configuration more preferable than another? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState
![]() |
Sun Jan-27-08 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
206. I bet it depends on the business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MANative
![]() |
Sun Jan-27-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
207. And the downturn in their business has absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC