|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:29 PM Original message |
Eliot, you couldn't just have had an affair? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. The sex was probably better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. A call girl service that required pre-deposited cash for sex! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Earth to Spitzer. Ever heard of a paper trail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. I believe high end professionals are used in these circumstances because they are pros who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah . . . as though prostitutes haven't told us who their clients are/were --- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It's always a risk, but there are ways to minimize them. High end prostitutes have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Poor argument, considering that the prostitute-ring busting guy just got caught --- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 11:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. He was caught, but not ratted out by the prostitute or agency. Don't you think there are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Not "ratted out" but the information was freely given upon request. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. No matter what happens, there's always the risk of it coming out eventually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. A man in that position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Well....the one he "chose" has her photo blasted all over the Intenet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
9. That's what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
10. because he thought he would get caught if he did it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
13. He didn't want any entanglements, any blabbing, any strings, any Linda Tripp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
15. elliot couldnt you just pull your pud you fool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-13-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. Look what happened to Clinton when he did that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC