originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:36 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: Is the Libby jury well hung? |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 08:38 PM by originalpckelly
:shrug:
|
| tblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. WTH is taking them so long??? |
| originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. They're having fun making paper airplanes out of the giant post-it pads. |
|
Or maybe...wello we won't talk about that.
|
| tblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 11. Maybe they found him guilty on all counts days ago, they just wanna make it look good |
| annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 5. They are being meticulous and thorough |
|
(but I think they're getting close, say Tuesday - ish)
|
| Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Sorry - the William Hung thing was too juicy not to vote for. :7
|
| originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. For a blind chick justice sure is good in bed. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-03-07 08:43 PM by originalpckelly
:spank:
Seriously, big time :spank:
|
| Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Hey - being blind actually MIGHT make her BETTER in bed. |
|
She has to feel around for everything.
:spank:
|
| originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. How did you know she was into S & M? |
| Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| HappyWeasel
(694 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. I voted No, but I will change that vote if nothing comes by Tuesday. |
| Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. I think you forgot to put the commas around the word 'well'... |
| A Brand New World
(803 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. I voted yes due to the fact that I'm sure there is at least one |
|
BushBot on the jury and there is absolutely no talking sense to those idiots. This is taking too long otherwise IMHO.
|
| Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-03-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I've served on juries; I have no idea what's going on |
|
It isn't likely that they are acquitting him. As on DUer pointed out the other day, they are asking questions as to what reasonable doubt is, which means that that some believe he did it, but are just simply wondering if the prosecution proved it to the proper standard.
Based on what I heard of the trial itself and only, I would vot guilty. If a reasonable person got information from the Vice President of the United States (or the presumed Vice President, as the case may be) with instruction to use that information to smear and attack the reputation of a particular individual, he would remember it.
That was introduced into evidence and it was not contradicted. Libby should fry.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
