|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
pinto
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:39 AM Original message |
Senate (S214) bars US Attorney General from appointing US Atty's w/out Senate confirmation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. i'll be damned. They actually did it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. it's nice isn't it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
24. Bond and Hagel against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
3. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
4. Who're the 2 who voted against it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I think I heard Hagel and ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. No surprisingly Joe kept his dick in his pants and voted with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. be still my heart. (and bowels.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 06:58 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Well if he was swingin' it, he would have caucused with the CONS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. Bond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. yup, Hagel said NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. perhaps they've tapped his phones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. Thanks! Found a link - it was Hagel and Kit Bond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. wow, thats a stunning vote total |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. Can't Bush Veto this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastic cat
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. If he's smart, he'll sign it. He's not smart. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. yeah but by that vote total, it is sure to be overriden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I agree ~~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Bush can veto anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Well, that's a veto-proof majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. thanks for the info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divernan
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. With that vote, the Senate could override any veto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
8. Checks and balances - how refreshing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. we have sacrificed so much under these thugs, we gave them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
15. WooooooooHoooooooo!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terri S
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. YES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Deleted message |
LSK
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. thats what the Republicans have been doing in Congress for the past 6 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IWantAChange
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
19. Anyone know how Specter voted? Wasn't he the original culprit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Specter was a co-sponsor of the bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
22. YES, YES, YES! ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Great Day!!! this needs some recs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 12:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Can't rec twice, but i can kick! ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
33. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. Wish we could check and balance them right outta there -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Tue Mar-20-07 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
37. They should have never approved the USA Fascist Act in the first place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 05:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC