|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 12:56 PM Original message |
Huffington Post: Kirsten Gillibrand Opposes the Obama Agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Don't say we didn't warn you..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Its simple. If she doesn't become more liberal. She will be defeated in a Primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. More liberal than pro-gay-marriage and pro-Medicare-for-all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. There is no shortage in the state of NY of people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walkaway
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. She only recently changed her mind about both those issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I heard on the news that Carolyn McCarthy, a Democratic Congresswoman from Long Island |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. She was on Tweety yesterday n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejas
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. ah yes, the Congressperson without a clue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. I would think Ms. Gillibrand would change her tune now that she represents the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. She said that during her acceptance speech for Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Well, she won't last long if she doesn't vote for the bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. did she talk about it, or just Paterson citing her earlier bill? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. It was her words... I mentioned it when you had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I tried looking for video but AP just had the same part I saw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is a poorly thought out political appointment, but fortunately temporary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nomally I like Lawrence O'Donnell, but I think he's overstating his case here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Yes he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
29. Isn't Obama also pro-balanced-budget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. In a way. She's come out in favor of marriage equality and he opposes it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
10. Can't keep printing money folks; you also owe China too much to keep expecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. we can always eat the rich. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. great suggestion!. I'll have my Upper Crust braised! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. I believe in fiscal responsibility as well - I'll wait and see if she really objects to spending now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
15. check out her comments on TARP and federal spending here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. The fault in the "logic of fiscal conservatism" is the belief that waste can be eliminated by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. right, I'm not saying it will eliminate waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Totally agree on the TARP giveaway, it is such a blatant, shameless, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. She voted against the TARP. Twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. The TARP is meant to save Wall Street. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Saving Wall Street = Dooming Everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. The executives on Wall Street killed Wall Street. New York state is losing revenue but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. If we had each received our share of the TARP money directly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Yes it didn't work exactly as planned, but if we had let all the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. The massive infusion of cash from everyone paying off personal debt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Obama asked for the remaining $350b- she voted against that this week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Stop making me love an upstate conservative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. What a fuckin distortion to not mention Fed Balanced Budget bills have supermajority exceptions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bottomtheweaver
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. In California, "balanced budget" means cutting education, health services, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walkaway
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
36. She is against amnesty for illegal immigrants and pro Fences... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
39. Deleted message |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
41. I am taking a wait and see attitude. However, I am disturbed by what I am reading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
42. Sooo... unbalanced budgets are "The Obama Agenda"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible
![]() |
Sat Jan-24-09 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
43. This is just wrong. How can one look at her record and conclude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC