PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 05:42 AM
Original message |
| Joe Scar thinks he's the master of the negative question: |
|
Putz...
It goes like this:
"Well, you can't say that you don't think that Barack Obama wouldn't have done that if Congress didn't and shouldn't pass the reversal of the negative-growth addendum to the reversal aspects of the soon-to-be-vetoed bill."
WTF?
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 05:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
given Joe's propensity towards not using self-deprecating humor that he could not have meant this to be a critique of his soon to be dead television career.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 5. I believe you mean . . . |
|
I could not decline to fail to say that I deny not asserting that.
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Well now your just being gratuitous...m/t |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 05:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. "Stupid" is Joey the Scar's natural talent ... |
|
You can't teach "STUPID." :( Pair that up with his sidekick "CLUELESS" you've got "Mourning Ho-Jo."
|
PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. It's Mourning in America... |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. there's so many double-negations in there that |
|
I think the universe collapsed in upon itself and was replaced by an exact replica ...
wait ... hasn't that happened before? I fear the coming of the Great White Handkerchief ...
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-27-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. He does his courtroom, leading questions schtick to get the answers |
|
he wants. He's very good at it when talking to repuke sheep.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Mar 17th 2026, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |