|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:35 AM Original message |
We are introducing a new DU feature that people have been requesting for a long time. (EDITED) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. I like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
62. Deleted message |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #62 |
86. Wow. We could use an "unrecommend" for replies, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:16 PM Response to Reply #86 |
211. snork. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #86 |
351. And I've often thought that some replies are worthy of a recommendation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. Awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
367. heh, 300 people so far have unrecommended this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
3. Thank you all! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. self-delete NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. Interesting... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
7. So, the 1000 recs on topics like "FUCK YEAH LETS GET HIGH" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Snerk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
46. Not to mention neutralizing the race to be the "5th Rec" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Yeah now it is going to be a yo-yo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fozzledick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
75. Let the unrecommend wars begin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:05 AM Response to Reply #46 |
368. I hope I never never never read that phrase again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
255. Oh man I LOVED that thread ..would have given it a hundred recs. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
8. We thank you and your staff for listening to us, trying new things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
337. I second this reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. Cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
10. How come this thread doesn't have the "unrecommend" link? ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
30. It should appear shortly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #30 |
64. And what if everybody unrecommends THIS thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. DU won't be crowded tomorrow? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #64 |
73. If you unrecommend an admin thread, you are automatically tombstoned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #73 |
95. Can I have double pepperoni? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #95 |
155. The Walt Starr Special! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #155 |
158. Uh Oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:34 PM Response to Reply #73 |
253. Right the fuck now?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #73 |
304. I'm glad you were kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madrone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 12:19 AM Response to Reply #73 |
364. And people say all the funny has left DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neecy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
11. I like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
12. Muchisimas gracias. Rec'd. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glorfindel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
13. Thank you. An excellent idea, as always, from our DU Administrators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Very Cool. Appreciate the expanded voice folks will have here at DU..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. will there be a "Worst" page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. Currently, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
308. we could have a "greatest" worst page. that might be fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #34 |
366. Rather than a "worst," I'd like to see a "most voted on" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 06:57 AM Response to Reply #366 |
381. That's not a bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
131. lmoa - you have that as your worst page too? I thought I was alone. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. We can't unrecommend this page? hmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. It should be working shortly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
262. You can now! :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
18. Sometimes I wish you guys were running our country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
19. Now I see it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
20. Will we see the individual tally of recs and unrecs, or just the end total? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
41. Currently we do not see the individual tally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
21. Cool, this'll be an interesting experiment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
22. Two words: Awe. Some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
23. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
24. Sweet. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
25. Can we take it into negative numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:50 AM Response to Reply #25 |
45. Yes and no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #45 |
63. Awww. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemisse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. So much for the races to be the most negative. That would've been fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
265. how about imaginary numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #265 |
299. My threads would earn a negative Pi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:42 PM Response to Reply #299 |
324. you mean like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
26. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
27. K&U! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AwakeAtLast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
28. More than anything, I like that our vote is counted immediately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
29. Cool it works! Test thread. Sorry about that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
32. Are you ever going to bring back the "color coded" critique system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #32 |
47. No. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
33. sorry about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
35. THANK YOU! Maybe there will be less garbage on the front page now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
36. nice. thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
37. Noice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
369. Oh, Man - Thanks for stopping the page redirect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
38. Great feature, Skinner... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
39. It's great that by recommending or unrecommending, you don't navigate away from the page! Cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:48 AM Original message |
Hey Skinner!!! Well as no one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
40. Wow! Excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
42. I like it, my only concern is that important threads will get knocked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #42 |
50. That's not the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #50 |
60. I agree, and I intend to use it in that constructive way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #50 |
93. See Reply #62. One Reaganite's, er, person's "junk"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #50 |
206. In other words, the point is to CENSOR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #206 |
223. Wouldn't censoring entail removal of content so it is entirely inaccessible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
239. Yay! I've been a fan of this idea for years! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
344. One person's junk is another person's treasure. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #50 |
370. Everyone who likes the "Unrecommend" feature rec this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:50 AM Original message |
Awesome!! Love it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
43. Hmmm...time to test this with a Michael Jackson thread, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
44. LOVE it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
48. This may end up in the "be careful what you wish for" bin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. I'll eat my hat if "Puppies Are Cute" or "I like pie" end up at the top of the Greatest Page. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #52 |
57. I'd post one, but I know you'll just lock it and declare victory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #52 |
120. I've got to see this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #52 |
162. looks like you can save your hat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #52 |
245. I can finally vote against threads about someone's cat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
261. Speaking of which,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #48 |
65. You might have a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. Personally, I plan on un-rec'ing every REC THIS thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #70 |
226. I think it's worth it just for the ability to do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #70 |
372. Hear, Hear!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. That is my concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #74 |
94. Why is that a concern? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #94 |
165. Yes, people who disagree do have a right to SAY they disagree by SAYING it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:44 PM Response to Reply #165 |
325. An excellent point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dragonfli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #165 |
329. Well, that is the intention of the feature is it not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pyoom (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #165 |
363. I trust people who post less rather than more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 07:04 AM Response to Reply #165 |
382. I dunno... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dragonfli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #74 |
318. That is the point - "DLC loyalty test" feature , DLC folks can spend all day here unrecing criticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #318 |
356. some surprising "unrecommends" in a thread about Andy Stephenson's health care nightmare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dragonfli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:37 PM Response to Reply #356 |
362. And they get to squash what true Democrats recommend with Their new rec "filibuster" minority power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
49. That changes my ignore list considerably. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
51. This is a nice feature, but it seems only half-implemented to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. That's how it's supposed to work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Ah. I missed that part, obviously. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
54. OK, immediate impression: Greatest Page looks too busy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
56. WTF?? Why can't we recommend or un-recommend threads in the Sports Forum?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
58. What will happen: Swarms of trolls will unrecommend threads with valuable info about hot subjects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. This is exactly what happens on Digg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky Luciano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
222. Those factions at Digg should probably try to get a job and/or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:11 PM Response to Reply #67 |
314. and since there is NO proprietary anything to prevent gaming the system, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. Yes, that could happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Are there any new rules pending on batch rec/unrec activity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. I don't think any new rules are necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #58 |
118. I'm with you. There are already hordes of trolls ever at the ready to swarm on certain topics who do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corpseratemedia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
150. My concern also. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
59. EXCELLENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the other one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
66. NOW we need an ANTI-Greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #66 |
84. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. never mind, i figured that out. doh! :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #66 |
115. here here - and add a place where all the deleted posts show back up at random without context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
72. linguistic nit: "unrecommend" sounds more like undoing your own previous recommendation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #72 |
76. We thought that this was the simplest way to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. someone charges you by the word? :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
77. Wicked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
79. You took away the "confirm (un)rec" dialog! Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
82. AWESOME!!! great idea!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
83. Yay! Thank you! :) K & R AND recommend doesn't go to another screen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
87. Nice. A couple of suggestions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #87 |
112. Yes, the + signs are unnecessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #112 |
399. does that mean you might consider dropping the "+" after an introductory period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
88. Very cool, Skinner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
89. i don't understand why so many people unrecommended this thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #89 |
98. Actually, the number of unrecs isn't very high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:33 PM Original message |
Weird humor probably to try it out :) I am going to try and see if I can both rec and unrec. Can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #89 |
110. oh, c'mon. Seriously? You don't understand why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #110 |
119. Hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #110 |
151. Excuse me, but some of us unrec'd this because we disagree that the unrec feature is a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #151 |
166. Then you should RECOMMEND the thread because you want lots of people to read your argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #166 |
180. It's my protest vote against the "unrecommend" feature. This thread is obviously in no danger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #180 |
208. I'm sorry I sounded snarky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #208 |
230. Thank you for responding. I appreciate the apology. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raffi Ella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #110 |
389. "...we have LOTS of psychological primary schoolers amongst us." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
90. Thank you! This is a great idea can I suggest a couple of others? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
91. I love it! One-click recommending! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
92. better than a whole case of troll-b-gone. thanks so much. np |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #92 |
154. (you can get that?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #154 |
182. shhh. it's a secret. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
96. my mild concern is that in instances like the previous primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. I agree that is a concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #99 |
111. ok then, good on ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
97. Great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
100. Maybe taking the 911 threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #100 |
320. Perhaps allowing 9/11 threads to acheive Greatest status with this new function? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:15 PM Response to Reply #100 |
331. Sometimes someone posts a brillant comment within a thread can we rec it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
101. Sort of like a blanket party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa Boule (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
102. Very well thought out implementation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
103. Thank you, SKinner, Elad, and EarlG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
104. Note: If you're not going to show negative rec numbers, then there's no need for the '+' sign.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
105. Excellent ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
106. Well good luck with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
107. Okay, I'm late to the party, but it seems like when the Freeper lurkers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
108. Hey Skinner .... you are to be commended for always keeping an open mind and being willing to undo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:57 PM Response to Reply #108 |
133. Good Point(s) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #108 |
139. Oh my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
109. Idea: color code the value. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
113. Didn't we try this once and it sucked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #113 |
401. No, we tried something else that sucked. I don't remember what it was, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
114. Popcorn please? I can already predict the half dozen ways that this will cause problems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #114 |
191. THANK YOU! The debate should end there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #114 |
219. PAID POSTERS? Where do I sign up? I NEED A JOB!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #219 |
251. They exist. I cannot prove it but I have lurked this board since it began. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #114 |
333. Yup, some posters hardly ever venture out of the dungeon. Clearly paid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
116. more people have unrecommended this thread than recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #116 |
128. I did... it's a terrible idea. Mob mentality will rule DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:07 PM Response to Reply #128 |
142. I "unrec'd" this thread, too. I think this is a very very bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EarlG ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #116 |
136. Actually that's not quite right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:35 PM Response to Reply #116 |
323. I did too. It's a lame idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
117. I love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
That Is Quite Enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
121. Good times with unrecommending, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
122. I hope this new feature dies and soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #122 |
145. I agree with scarlet woman. I think this is a bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #145 |
345. Bullseye. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #122 |
147. Excellent, excellent point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:19 PM Response to Reply #122 |
346. I also agree with scarletwoman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #122 |
412. I agree with you completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
123. This will accomplish exactly one thing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. That's ALL this is about. How unfortunate. CENSORSHIP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #123 |
129. Awww... the whiners are no longer free from criticism. How sad.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Wow. You're a really dishonest person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #123 |
157. I think you need a new dictionary. Look up the word censorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #157 |
159. Tell me, scheming daemons, why don't you look it up yourself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #159 |
169. Here ya go... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #169 |
177. Look how far you've come already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #177 |
188. It doesn't prevent it from being seen. Not in the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #188 |
199. Hmm.. You seem to be running now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #199 |
203. Not running from anything.... You called it censorship... it clearly is not.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #203 |
207. So, just because the minority won't be heard because of censors, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #188 |
310. The trouble is that a lot of threads are generated by the minute, and it takes no time at all for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #123 |
189. that's pretty much it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #123 |
225. Whether something appears on the Greatest Page or not has no bearing on.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #225 |
227. Well then, I guess I can just print it out and stick it in my pocket instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #227 |
386. Definitely an option. I print posts all the time. Which reminds me, I have one I printed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
124. We should be able to see the negative number. That way we see how delusional certain groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #124 |
127. You can simply subtract the positive rating from the total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:58 PM Response to Reply #127 |
135. Thanks :-) I just realized that. I still don't like it... but whatever, I'll still be here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EarlG ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #127 |
137. That's not quite how it works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #137 |
156. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
126. Note: There's little point in not showing the precise negative number... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:02 PM Response to Reply #126 |
138. Note: I make mistakes. Thanks for pointing it out in your usual manner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #126 |
140. Your equations are correct, but they don't prove your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #140 |
143. Note that I said "the bulk of", not "all of". And similarly, I said "little point"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:05 PM Response to Reply #140 |
312. The second equation is incorrect (or typo?). Using EarlG's terminology/example in #136 for clarity: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #126 |
144. On second thought.. the number SHOULD be shown because most people won't bother. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #144 |
148. Doesn't matter much to me either way. I can see reasons pro and con on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #148 |
153. True. Isn't mine either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:35 PM Response to Reply #153 |
176. :) It's the right thing to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #126 |
193. in other words, there *is* a point, & it would be more transparent, to post the two totals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #193 |
195. They resolved the issue by taking away more information - hahahahha!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
130. I LIKE it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
134. Thank you for the trial, but I'll understand if it doesn't work out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
141. So, at this time your post has +52 recommends of 138 votes??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #141 |
163. Aparently 2 to 1 AGAINST this feature: Recommendation: +56 (152 votes) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #163 |
170. No, it's a net +56 out of 152 votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EarlG ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #163 |
171. That's not how it works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #171 |
172. Ok. Thanks for the clarification. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #171 |
201. Re: "I think we're going to...remove the total number of votes so it just shows the net score." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #171 |
229. I think that's too bad. The most interesting part of the whole thing is the internal dynamics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:09 PM Response to Reply #229 |
302. Re: "Go ahead and let it all hang out."... I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #163 |
197. I assume that half of those just simply thought it was funny to unrecommend a Skinner post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
146. Sweet! Love how you stay on the page now too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #146 |
164. Yes, staying on the same page part, that I like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
149. My suggestion... if you keep this feature, show the actual negative number instead of " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
152. Do we really want important, controversial posts to suffer & bland, noncontroversial posts to bene- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
160. I wish this feature was not added. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
161. Bravo! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
167. UPDATE: We are going to make a change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:05 PM Original message |
lol - Because giving people *less* information is the way to clear up confusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #167 |
210. I should've read the entire thread before responding to EarlG, above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #210 |
270. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #167 |
234. I don't know if there is a better way to present it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sophie-Helene (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 11:18 PM Response to Reply #167 |
409. Clearly, I Joined DU 2 Days Too Late |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
168. I like the rec/unrec total. People are tryin' it out! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
173. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
174. Woot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
175. (snarfle) "confusion". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
178. As much as I think this might be useful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EarlG ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #178 |
185. We will be keeping an eye on how the system is being used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #185 |
187. Here is an example of what I'm afraid of (as posted above): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #187 |
198. I just rec'd it and saw that it had 17 votes altogether. That means 8 people showed up to take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #198 |
218. Of course it's going to suck. The whole point is to allow community censorship, completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #218 |
233. How does this negate discussion? You are free to continue discussing on GD and GD:P |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #233 |
235. It's the discussion at any forum other than GREATEST that is the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #233 |
266. It lessens discussion. Important topics can be kept off the greatest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #178 |
238. Exactly. And there are plenty of trolls and closet subversives ready to stymie discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
179. I love it!! In fact in honorarium I have an 'unrecommend thread' in the lounge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
181. If a post gets 5 or more votes, gets on Greatest Page then gets net negative votes does it come off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
183. Dupe delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mimitabby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
184. what an interesting idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
186. Delete. Found sub-thread for my question... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
190. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
192. Yep....Loves It! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
194. Works good, ugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
196. A suggestion-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:20 PM Response to Reply #196 |
213. It's an interesting idea, I could live with that. In fact, I think it's the ONLY way this is going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thesquanderer (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
200. The problem I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
202. Bad. Fucking. Idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
204. just a thought - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
205. I like this new system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
209. Just staying on the same page after recommending was worth the price of admission! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
212. Maybe a tweak is in order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:23 PM Response to Reply #212 |
216. that's a good idea as well - 'less than zero' is pretty disheartening when zero would suffice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
214. can you have negative net votes? Oooooh. The Worst of DU page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
215. Excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
217. Skinner, I noticed you've changed it so now one can't tell how many unrecommends a post has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
220. You must know that people are going to game this. I think it's a bad idea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #220 |
236. No more than gaming the "k and R" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
221. It did not work. It stayed the same after I unrecommend this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #221 |
224. Maybe somebody rec'd it at the same time and cancelled you out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
228. Why have the plus sign if not displaying the negatives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
231. Great feature. Hopefully one day we will also see just how low an OP's rating is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
232. Oh, they will love this in the GDP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #232 |
237. the all-star (assholes) are already disparaging anyone who doesn't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #237 |
241. And I guess the non-star (assholes) are already disparaging anyone who does like it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
240. I'm already seeing threads with less than zero that shouldn't bother anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #240 |
242. Here is another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #242 |
246. Acutally some freeper is going around unrec'ing anything to do with Ensign, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #240 |
400. I rec'd and unrec'd about 6-8 threads yesterday when I encountered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JonLP24 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
243. How do you unrecommend something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 06:08 AM Response to Reply #243 |
380. an actual unrecommend function would be more handy IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
244. I think this is a really bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
247. I hate this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
248. I got a couple of more ideas... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:27 PM Response to Reply #248 |
249. One more ..you can only unrec after 1000 posts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
250. Double Plus Ungood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
252. Good feature: May I suggest limiting the number of Unrecommends? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wroberts189 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
254. Like the admin said ..lets try it and see how it goes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
256. Heaven forbid we continue to have controversial topics at the top of the Greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
257. Thank you Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
258. What next, an option to recommend banning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
259. THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
missingthebigdog (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
260. A suggested tweak that might help balance things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:01 PM Original message |
We're trying this again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
263. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pecwae (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
264. Fabulous and fair functionality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
267. Why are there new OPs which are just responses to this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
268. Register another positive response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
live love laugh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
269. YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!! Best. Feature. Ever. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
271. You know what would be good (IMO)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #271 |
272. That would be fun! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
273. This is a feature that doesn't enhance dialog but seems more like a weapon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
274. K & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
275. Let this one play out longer this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
276. I think this will be a disaster when you have a contested primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
277. Thank you Skinner, this will keep the stupid flamewar threads of the Greatest Page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #277 |
317. Taking care of stupid flamewar threads is a mod's responsibility. Mods monitor and moderate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
278. I'm afraid this may be too democratic! Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
279. This can only further divide the community. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff30997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #279 |
284. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
280. It's too much like "Freeping a Poll" ... not sure I like it (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
281. Skinner - why not allow people to opt out of the feature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
282. Have you considered limiting the number of times someone can rec/unrec threads per day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
283. unrec'd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
285. Very nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuvok Obama (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
286. I love the current Greatest Page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
287. The logic behind the new feature is sound. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
288. May I be the first to unrecommended this/ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #288 |
289. Too late. I already did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
290. This is great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
291. Well Done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
292. Oops. Um, it works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
293. Alright!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamuu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
294. this makes sense, and it is apparent you put alot of thought into it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
295. And so, the Rec This Thread If... posts are finished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
296. My problem with this is that I think it will have the effect of eliminating some very useful posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
297. Terrific idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
298. Whew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
300. I just clicked "rec' for this thread and it didn't add me in the total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #300 |
301. Concurrency. Someone could have unrec'd around the same time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #301 |
313. Ah. Good point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
303. Sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
305. doesn't seem to make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blaze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
306. Just testing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
307. Give it a try. If it doesn't fly real well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
309. May I cast my vote against this? Also against the new tweak of not showing vote totals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
311. Best of luck with the new function, Mr. Skinner. If anyone can make such a thing work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
315. Hmmm.... dare I "unrecommend" this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
316. I'm totally NOT a complainer.....but this new feature blows. I hate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
319. was it necessary to require enabled javascript for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raffi Ella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
321. I think you guys have jumped the shark with this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #321 |
339. try the gun dungeon ;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
322. I think you'll be surprised at what things still make the greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
326. do not want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
327. No confirmation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
328. Now, if we could only get single click poll voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
330. i did it! -- i just had to -- you had over 80 -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
332. So, instead of "K&R!" will it be "F&U!" ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
334. Thank you for your work and I love DU but: K&U, don't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RavensChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
335. Great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
336. Love it, thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberation Angel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
338. DU will get gamed and it will be very hard to catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #338 |
348. It just seems so... lazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:26 PM Response to Reply #338 |
358. AGREED! Please read this post and drop the new system!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
340. Thinking about this.. if we had only adults (emotionally) this could be a great feature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #340 |
341. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tindalos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
342. I like that it stays on the same page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
343. Why weren't the ignore and hide threads features |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
347. Better late than never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
349. It sucks.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
350. Had to unreccomend this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
352. love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
353. Cool. Now, I want to know who can't handle, uh . . . has me on Ignore. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:40 PM Response to Reply #353 |
355. lol, me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
354. Will be interesting to see how it works out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
357. Now that we have this there's hope that FB will add an "Unlike" button |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
359. Who the heck wanted this? Did you run polls? Is it to get rid of a certain segment? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
360. I dislike the Unrecommend. please take it off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
361. Why not post the total number & post the super hot threads with the highest total up & down?nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
365. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
371. The Result: It accurately identifies threads truly Recommended by posters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
373. How is this not polarizing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
374. it's a horrible, disastrous idea, especially in its edited form - which just shows the net total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
375. i just unrec'd btw, after my initial (not thought through) enthusiasm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
376. Power to the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
377. K&U A very democratic idea -- mob "democracy," that is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mogster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
378. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
379. How about a "Neutral" button. Then we can have a "Whatever" page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
383. Good idea Skinner Thanks!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
384. REC WARS!!!! FUCK YEAH!!!!1! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
385. With cliques, who needs fairness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strong Atheist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
387. Good idea. I would change one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
388. L like it Skinner nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PerpetuallyDazed (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
390. Can't get on the band wagon with this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FailureToCommunicate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
391. Thanks Skinner, and all. Change we can believe in! Thanks for all your hard work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
392. Bug Report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
393. I have doubts it is a net gain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sojourner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
394. yay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
live love laugh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
395. At some point I'd like to know who holds the record for unrecs. LOL. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 11:02 AM Response to Reply #395 |
396. It looks like it's this thread. +96 of 424 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
397. I don't like it. Too many trolls here. Perhaps going back to limiting number or recs per day or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyskye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
398. SUGGESTION: Enable sorting by 'Views'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
402. The count should only go to zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #402 |
403. That stifles the voice of those who want to unrecommend. Their unrecommend should count against any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #403 |
405. Can I vote against Palin today - just in case she even thinks about running.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #405 |
406. Not the same thing. An Unrec is a vote somehow against an aspect of the OP; a rec is a vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 11:38 PM Response to Reply #403 |
410. Then the URs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:29 PM Response to Reply #402 |
404. I agree with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
407. What is the policy behind keeping certain highly recommended threads off the Greatest page list? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
408. k & r n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Haole Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
411. I think you could take out the.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
413. How about making it multiple choice. This is just like candidate elections! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
414. Skinner, I'm sure you are debating your decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:49 AM Response to Reply #414 |
429. Good assessment of how Unrecommend adds badly needed balance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
415. Suggestion - Display both Unrec and Rec numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 03:51 AM Response to Reply #415 |
416. Agree, fully. Provision of totals for both Recs & Unrecs at least affords a weight to the NetScores. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #416 |
420. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:21 AM Response to Reply #416 |
424. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:45 AM Response to Reply #415 |
417. Blackbox Unrecommendations... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Haole Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:17 AM Response to Reply #415 |
418. Much more transparent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #418 |
419. What would you do with that info if you had it? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:47 AM Response to Reply #415 |
428. I think giving the actual numbers would give a more accurate assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
421. Skinner ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
422. It's really no big deal to me but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
423. Good see that you are now catering to the DUers that cannot do arithmetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
425. Is this a trial run and if so, how long until you decide whether to keep it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
426. Unrecommend is a success, broadly supported by DUers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:07 AM Response to Reply #426 |
427. Sig Heil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #427 |
431. I didn't realize THAT was your party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 07:55 PM Response to Reply #431 |
435. You also like to pile unsupported assertion on assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #435 |
438. Still stalking me, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:10 PM Response to Reply #438 |
439. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:29 AM Response to Original message |
430. This system has the same drawback as the original, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #430 |
432. OK. "Thumbs up":"Thumbs down" with unassailable-"Recommends": Sort by "Recs" and %-"ThumbsUp" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #430 |
434. Worse than that. At least W's press conferences were civil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
433. I vote to keep this. After a few days it's value is obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:01 PM Response to Reply #433 |
437. Except that isn't what is happening. The people you are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #437 |
440. Nice of you to take a sly shot at the poster "I know it's hard for you to understand..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #440 |
442. And how is that responsive to the issues I raised? Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #442 |
443. It's not!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #443 |
444. My venom? ! Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #444 |
445. Nope, I'm not alerting on anybody any more (well, unless they're clearly a Freeper or it's vile) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #445 |
447. And you have not addressed a single issue I raised. Your choice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #447 |
449. Oh, Poo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 02:47 AM Response to Reply #449 |
455. Yes, you seem to be on an endless loop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
436. For what it's worth, my observations over several days are condensed below. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #436 |
452. This post is a correction/supplement to my post above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
441. Well, it's been 4 days and someone kicked this thread so I'll say this feature is working better ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #441 |
448. It is no longer the Greatest Page, if in fact it ever was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #448 |
450. Greatness is now agreed to by consensus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #450 |
451. Never liked that either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
446. I think the feature stinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
453. Just an FYI: So far, only 49% have expressed unreserved approval |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-14-09 12:27 AM Response to Reply #453 |
454. Astute and significant observation. Thanks for counting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC