Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 07:51 AM
Original message |
| Yet another version of the creepy McNaughton painting.. This one stars Cthulhu .. be warned.. |
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 07:54 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Substantially less horrifying than the original |
armyowalgreens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Well it's certainly more evocative. |
-..__...
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Thanks for my new desktop! |
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. LOL... I hope that's not on your work computer.. |
|
Not everyone has a taste for this kind of stuff. :evilgrin:
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The original artist screwed up the perspective view on the WWI soldier. |
|
That remains for me the most disturbing aspect of this piece of 'work'. While most of the painting is a fair effort at soviet realism, when it came to putting the WWI doughboy into the frame, the artist went all egyptian and made the little guy a bit too little. That soldier sort of floats in his separate vanishing point.
Nice job though revealing the actual content.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Isn't that Mitch McConnell in his Ben Franklin Halloween costume? |
|
Profile would be about right.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-10-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 28th 2026, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |