|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
southerncrone
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:24 PM Original message |
Ideas about UNRECOMMEND. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue neen
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. I have also made that mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. good ideas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think the issue needs more discussion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. No, this issue has already been discussed to death and has been settled on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I'm sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't even understand of the point of having a unrecommend feature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I don't understand why people get their panties in a wad over it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Because we LOVE to confound people who can show us the error of our ways, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Well that sure contributed to the discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Just responding in kind to your "panties in a wad" sneer, dearie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 06:14 PM Response to Reply #25 |
44. "don't make it so easy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southerncrone
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
30. Panties not wadded. No vanity, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Well, do you agree with every thread? Would you like a way of expressing your disagreement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. I suppose I could ignore the post, or address the OP with my reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. Only if you require Rec to show their name as well. Fair is fair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I don't even understand of the point of having a recommend feature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. I've concluded that the unrec feature is just proof of Skinner's sick & twisted sense of humor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. Reflecting all three numbers seems logical to me and I don't know why someone would argue against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 06:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
42. That was the original implementation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. It's only about making the "greatest page" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catshrink
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. This has nothing to do with the Greatest Page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. I think that's a 'mercy rule' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Nope it's about wanting to shut people up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Sounds like some real f'ed up people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 06:50 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:22 AM Response to Reply #10 |
53. Yes. It's also painful to have one's pet thread graded in public... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. well, my rec didn't get you out of minus--I tried. LOVE your avatar, by the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. I Wish There Was A Time Period (Like Editing) Where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Horse. Dead. Beat it more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Call Me Wesley
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
37. I have a billy bat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
19. I unrec all threads about unrec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Those ideas are good, if we can't go with the best idea: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
24. Sounds good to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southerncrone
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Exactly my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I have to agree...unrec needs to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. giving the reason why rather defeats the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. this very post has made the knucklejerk unreccers very upset! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Call Me Wesley
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
32. There's an unrecommend button? Who knew?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbieo
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I don't understand what it is for and how it works, so I ignore it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Call Me Wesley
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Actually, it doesn't do much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amerigo Vespucci
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
38. It's a very convenient method for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
41. It works great as it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
43. I've accidently hit the wrong button too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
45. What would be FUNNIEST (maybe not best, but fuckin' hilarious)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2 Much Tribulation
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
47. I'd like to see every action on a post, including recs & unrecs & edits, be a kick n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
48. Gosh, you know what would be great? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
49. I love Unrecommend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Sun Jan-17-10 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
50. The only solution for all the problems UnRec causes is to not give a shit about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
52. Unrec... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
54. Unrec is a way for rethug trolls to respond without blowing their cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC