Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tumulty of Time.com is either really dumb, Or Intentionally Making Biden Look Bad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 11:54 PM
Original message
Tumulty of Time.com is either really dumb, Or Intentionally Making Biden Look Bad
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1615356,00.html


No hits, no runs, no errors. The much-anticipated first "debate" of the 2008
Democratic candidates Thursday night at South Carolina State University in Orangeburg, S.C., was a polite event — and not a particularly enlightening one. Part of the problem was the format, in which candidates were limited to 60-second answers and not allowed to engage each other. Part of it was the sheer number of people onstage: eight candidates in all. But after 90 minutes, it was hard to pick out a single memorable answer. The only thing made clearer is why the candidates, who are facing scores of requests to repeat the exercise, are trying to put a limit to the number of debates in which they will participate.

The top three contenders — Clinton, Obama, and Edwards — did little to hurt or help themselves. That made it a wash for them. None of the so-called "second tier" — Senators Joe Biden and Chris Dodd and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson — managed what they were hoping for, which was a badly needed breakout moment. Biden, however, got the biggest laugh of the night when moderator Brian Williams brought up his well deserved reputation for talking too much and committing gaffes. "Can you reassure voters in this country that you would have the discipline you would need on the world stage, Senator?" Williams asked. Biden's answer: "No." Which was followed by a long, pregnant silence.

I dont know how you make that mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Being a twit helps.
:eyes:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-26-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. She deserves a Second Worst Person in the World for this IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. She didn't even get the one-word answer right
It was, "Yes."

What a twit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I dont know how she screws up that word. Because changing the word makes Biden look terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I just sent them a note requesting a correction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. She found nothing memorable in hearing the truth for 90 minutes
from eight distinguished states-persons-- and she blew Biden's great response. This should give a hint as to how she functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. A "Yes" is different from a "No"... VERY different...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wrote and asked for a correction, too - please kick this
others may want to do it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Where did you write to?
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 12:35 AM by hnmnf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I see it's corrected now - but at the top of the article
if you clicked on the author's name, it gave you a form to write to the editor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. a "Yes" followed by laughter becomes a "No" followed by silence?
Ah, gotta love that journamalism. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. How do these people
get their jobs?!?!?

(Sent correction request to Time.com)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I have no fucking clue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Time made the correction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's Not A Correction, That's A Whitewash
Hopefully someone got a screen cap of this...as the "corrected" version doesn't mention how Tumulty butchered this quote in the first place....and as others here have noted, it changes the whole context of things. Shameless ass covering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. It still wasnt followed by a silence
But by laughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 04th 2026, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC