Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 11:54 AM
Original message |
| stupidest response I ever received from anyone |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 12:05 PM by Mari333
on a poll about legalizing the civil rights of glbt to marry
"WHERE IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS DOES IT SAY GAY PEOPLE CAN MARRY!?"
are people really this dumb?
please say it isnt so, please say this is one in a million
|
Guy Whitey Corngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. The answer to your question is yes. And it's closer to 7 out of every 10. nt |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. hahaha you name is priceless |
LaydeeBug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Alas, my dear Mari333, when you think you've seen all of teh stupid... |
|
you are confronted with vast reserves. They have vast reserves of teh stupid on hand.
|
blueworld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Don't give up hope, I'm sure there's someone dumber yet to come n/t |
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 12:02 PM by G_j
though I bet they don't know what is actually IN the Constitution.
|
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. well I responded by asking him where in the bill of rights does it say Black people can vote |
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. Or any person. Does he say why he thinks constitutional rights are limited to |
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 14. LOL, and BTW, nowhere does it say in the Constitution |
|
that people can drive cars, own TVs, or wear purple. :shrug:
|
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 32. Or have an AIr Force. n/t |
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. People can be bone stupid sometimes. nt |
leeroysphitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. The internets is an endless solid wall of stupid that we keep beating or heads on. n/t |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. It is kind of fun to F with people's heads, however |
KingFlorez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. I've seen that one many times |
|
And all from the so-called pro-constitution types who pick through it and interpret it how they want.
|
pipi_k
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. And where in the Bill of Rights does it say that only people who can, or will, |
|
have children can marry?
Hey, maybe we should force people who haven't produced a child within two years of marriage to divorce...and prohibit menopausal women and men with vasectomies from marrying, too.
damn.
Lots of real lonely single brain cells out there!
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. Where does it say they can't? |
|
Where does it say that breeders can?
Yes, Limbeciles are even dumber than your worst imaginings.
|
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 20. not, to pick a fight...even though this is probably going to... |
|
the term "breeders" is rather offensive.
|
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 28. I am a breeder and I am not offended |
|
But if you want to try to hijack this thread with a PC war, flame away!
|
Sugarcoated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 31. It is an awful way to describe another, or one's self, |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 01:58 AM by Sugarcoated
but I bet that's the intention of most people who use it; to incite and offend others, get a reaction.
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Was that a DU poll? If so, the member should have gotten his/her ass alerted on. |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. no no it was on Facebook |
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. I don't know so much about facebook, but if you can see "friends'" replies, |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 12:36 PM by Heidi
I'd unfriend anyone opposed to equal human rights, unless I had a reasonable chance of leading them to the light. At 46, I choose my battles carefully. I don't spend much time on people who are genuinely recalcitrant.
|
pipi_k
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. At 57, I pick my battles even more carefully... |
|
There are friends and neighbors I know I don't have a chance of "leading to the light", even with regards to basic human rights, but that doesn't mean these people are mean or evil.
In fact, many of them are extremely kind and thoughtful people.
And some of them know what my political and religious attitudes are...often 180 degrees from their own...yet they've never denigrated me or my beliefs. They practice tolerance, even knowing that my beliefs run totally counter to their own.
I can't punish them for their beliefs as long as they're willing to view me as a person beyond my beliefs. If someone wants to "unfriend" me because of what I do or do not believe, well, that's their choice.
:)
|
Heidi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. I've never known a truly kind, thoughtful homophobe, racist, anti-Semite, mysognist, or misandrist. |
|
If anyone wants to "unfriend" me for standing by principles that harm no one but contribute to human evolution, I'll consider it a character endorsement.
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Actually, it says it in the 1st Amendment. |
|
In the 'hands off religion' clause. If you belong to a gay church, and the pastor marries you, the government cannot say you are not married. (Even though it does.) That would be interfering in religious beliefs.
IMO.
|
Taitertots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 36. There is a difference between saying you are married |
|
and legally recognizing them as such.
A church can tell me I'm an eagle, that doesn't mean I'm legally recognized as one.
|
zipplewrath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,...
Take your pick. Justice? Tranquility? Blessings of Liberty?
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 33. Try Amendment V, XIV and Article IV sec 1 |
|
"no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
and
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
See also: "immutable characteristics" and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
|
guitar man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"Where does it say they can't?"
And I would remind them that the Constitution does not grant rights, but serves to place restrictions on government.
|
lib_n_proud7650
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 23. I encounter these idjits everyday |
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 25. Sadly, millions everyday tune into Glenn Blech and Rush and O'Reilly and |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-12-10 01:22 PM by progressoid
get their irrational behavior reinforced.
|
TransitJohn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 26. I realized at a young age that |
|
there is not bottom most depth of human stupidity.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-12-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. The pursuit of happiness? |
donheld
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 01:34 AM
Response to Original message |
| 29. I'd bet they're some actually dumber than that. |
RedCappedBandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message |
| 30. Yes, people are that dumb. nt |
Taitertots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 34. I'm pretty sure it doesn't even say straight people can marry |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-13-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
| 35. Yes, people are that dumb. Sad, but true. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 12th 2026, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message |