|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
RandySF
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 01:53 AM Original message |
WV mine is non-union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. not just non-union, but run by the most anti-union evil SOB ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. It's much more likely that those pesky mine owners break anyone who tries to organize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. it's exactly like that - In fact, it's how the current CEO got the job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I was just about to post thanking you for the information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Sadly, I'm not surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. 25 dead --- rescue operations suspended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. Reportedly Massey's policy is to run the most profitable, easiest to cream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 05:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. 498 safety violations last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. WAS non-union ???? IS non-union! (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
9. it's not just "non-union" - that company is a union buster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 06:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
12. Not surprising at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
15. They also have a history of safety violations, according to federal officials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC