|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:04 PM Original message |
"ARE MEN NECESSARY?" - a book by Maureen Dowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, without them, there'd be no women at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. +1,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Speaking for all men... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Not sure you can speak for all men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #47 |
124. Stop kissing up to people who could care less about your gender |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. not men, just YOU n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #125 |
130. Scout, based upon your illogicities of the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #130 |
136. hahahaha means so little you had to reply, eh? ROFL n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #39 |
91. -1 (Wonderful men notwithstanding.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
64. Not for long. With advances in cloning and related fields a member of the opposite sex will no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #64 |
76. Wouldn't you still need sperm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. No reason we can't get to the point where one is both the mother and father of a cloned child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Actually you are your cloned child, only older. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. A clone would be a separate person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #84 |
141. No, your clone would be your differently-aged twin. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
102. There's a reason sexual reproduction is the norm in the animal world-- infectious disease. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #102 |
107. I'm sure cloning could be made to be quicker than 9 months in the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 07:26 AM Response to Reply #64 |
118. In the year 6565 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
89. Well, actually, there is a procedure called tri-gametic fertilization where two women can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. But of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
40. You've brought the hidden lesbian out in me, though, Codeine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #40 |
52. the lovely Amanda Palmer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
103. Codeine, I would say YOU are VERY necessary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
128. Yes, you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. Only if they're wearing earth tones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I'm wearing a Hawaiian shirt with tropical fish on it. Will that do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Is there a history forum? Because her shtick has been around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. She wrote because she an't getting any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. She's been mangry for so long... she's evidently not mungry anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Doesn't sound bitter so far . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Book Lover
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Dowd is a textbook example of why having the voice of feminism be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
93. Did you read it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Book Lover
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #93 |
97. Yes - I read three chapters and then stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #97 |
119. I would think that a "Book Lover" would know enough to read a whole book before judging it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. A few for propagation and those should be very carefully watched. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Speak for yourself. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. good to hear when a man doesnt allow himself to be put in the tired old conditioned role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
43. 3 posts on the thread, and each enforces the OP's point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. I'm least "manly-man" around. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. We do need you for a good lay, but other than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Good point. How about a rite of passage at, say 16 - 18 years, where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
71. "women being the more reasonable sex" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #71 |
98. I find your post offending. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. I find your offense offending. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #104 |
109. Really? That's your response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Really? That's your response to my response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #71 |
126. Jesus, they do no self reflection, do they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
70. Self-loathing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. Deleted message |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:03 PM Response to Reply #70 |
86. How sad is it that you have no argument to counter so have the replies deleted, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. There's where the thread used to be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
127. Spoken by the "I want mommy's love" neutered male |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. so much cooler being manly calling us the cunt brigade, bah hahaha. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. Well if the shoe fits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. your chewing mens ass off and calling women cunts.... and you talk about shoe fitting for me??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. and you snuck the mod police on a thread that should have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. hm... the only anti male on this thread seems to be from a male. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. I used to think you were objective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #135 |
139. again. there are not women standing with dowd, not impressed with dowd or the writing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. that's the only mode he has n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
8. One can only hope the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
56. I'm up to page 115 - not sure how it's gonna end yet . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'll ask my wife the next time theres a bug in the house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. there are ways without a man. before i was married i kept a can of raid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. When my wife moved to California to marry me, she saw one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. what a woman. i taught my oldest son his responsible to learn to not be bothered by bugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. So you're tired of men being put into conditioned roles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. yup. it is something we laugh about in this house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Well, so long as you instill those preconditioned roles with your eyes wide opened, then. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Deleted sub-thread |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #27 |
111. Are you just going to continue pushing for a fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I like bugs. I've had pet spiders and hissing cockroaches. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Don't tell my wife, but they bite pretty hard, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. Witty and wide ranging.. well I haven't read it so I won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:10 AM Response to Reply #20 |
59. I'm not familiar with "her schtick" - but so far, I'm not offended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. I like Dawd - she's got that snarky intelligence - but that title bugs me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Ignore the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I don't think Dawd is boring at all, as I said I like her caustic and snarky ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftinOH
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. Without us men- who would fight all the wars for you gals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #28 |
94. Maybe the wars would stop? - - THAT'd be a big plus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. All of DU would like it? Judging by the title... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
142. As opposed to judging from the actual reaction of DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
32. Men are irreplaceable, essential, make life worth living. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. For her, they probably aren't nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
35. Guys I know dig "smart successful women," Maureen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
36. Is Maureen Dowd necessary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
37. I love men!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Me, too!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
79. I love women! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MerryBlooms
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
38. WE are necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
42. For those of us women who tend to steer straight, yes, men come in quite handy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
44. A bullshit title to sell books. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
45. Men. MMMM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
46. Who Was That Woman That Used To Post Here That Hated Men? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #46 |
57. I'm up to page 115 - don't see any hate yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 08:43 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. My God No! But She Was the Most Vehement About It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. "So the book has a humorous tone? " - yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. are you kidding. i read almost a book a day. read the first chapter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I suggest you read the whole book - slowly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
50. And speaking of penis envy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 08:46 AM Response to Reply #50 |
61. Speaking For Myself, I Thank the Stars Every Day That I Will Never Have to Go Through Childbirth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tumbulu
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #50 |
101. I agree with you that the entire patriarchal system is a result of birth envy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
106. Great Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrushka
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 03:18 AM Response to Reply #50 |
117. My own theory says it was Freud, himself, who probably suffered from "penis envy". It might have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. I've heard it said as long as women like peanut butter they'll still need 1 man to open the jars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 08:27 AM Response to Reply #51 |
95. Well that is total bullshit - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TK421
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. Of course they are! Someone has to leave the toilet seat up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
55. Haters. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
58. Pft, Maureen Dowd I haven't seen anyone wag their jaw like Maureen Dowd since... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
62. Every time I see her on TV, she looks drunk and pilled up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
113. I don't even know what to say to that -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #113 |
116. She looks tipsy every time she's on TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
63. I've heard that Dowd really slams Hillary Clinton in that book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. sorta - but she slams Bill too . . . I'd say Bill got the bigger "slam" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KonaKane
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
68. I sort of gave Dowd my hand to talk to when she bashed Howard Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
72. As necessary as women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #72 |
82. Is anyone necessary? What a crook to suggest one is better than the other! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
73. Old Moe Dowd can be quite the pontificator... but is occasionally entertaining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
74. Begs the question: is Maureen Dowd necessary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
77. From the perspective of a man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
78. ALL men are not necessary. Women of the world only need one man & I'm available... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #78 |
92. ROFLMAO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItNerd4life
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #78 |
123. Even if all the women looked like Maureen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #123 |
137. LOL, well many guys consider her "hot"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
80. A great mentor of mine said "Women control 75% of the world's wealth, and 100% of the vaginas"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
83. Maureen is still stuck back in the era of the first feminism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sat Apr-10-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Erma Bombeck got it with this one, IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 08:29 AM Response to Reply #83 |
96. Actually - she adresses the issue of "the first feminism" in this book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
99. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Deleted message |
jdp349
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
105. I hate DU so much when the topic of gender/sex comes up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn
![]() |
Sun Apr-11-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Agreed. The level of discourse usually descends to that of 7-year-olds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 10:59 PM Response to Reply #108 |
114. Thats jest plain doo doo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn
![]() |
Tue Apr-13-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Poo poo on you too. :-D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. Bricks & stones may break my bones... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galileoreloaded
![]() |
Mon Apr-12-10 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
112. Gosh I hope so!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
121. Deleted message |
Jennicut
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
122. MoDo sure knows how to treat other women with respect...or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
140. Finished the book! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC