|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
rurallib
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:10 PM Original message |
Howard Dean for Supreme Court! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think my Murray Hill joke thread had more IRL potential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. I thought we're supposed to elect him President ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnlal
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because Obama won't nominate a liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I'd call Dean more of a moderate than a liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
6. First of all, as much as I like Howard Dean, the GOP would go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. He's not a judge and to my knowledge, not even a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. No thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue_onyx
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Not gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. Too old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. We may need to run him against Obama in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. Dorgan? Bayh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester Messiah
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Lack of any judiciary expertise whatsoever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. not just lack of experience as a judge. not a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Apr-09-10 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
14. That's fucking brilliant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC