|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Kadie
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:07 PM Original message |
PETA Targets Tracy, CA Woman Over Animal Sacrifice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. PETA uses gas to kill animals I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. wow- first post with a link to the "Center for Consumer Freedom" website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. So you are saying the data is false? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. A lot of it is, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Deleted message |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
46. You argue points by using labels. Shoot the messenger type of thing. Good job (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. I think of it more like pearls before swine. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
45. Newsweek: Since 1998 PETA has killed more than 17,000 animals, nearly 85 percent of all those it has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
53. What if the same data came directly from the State of VA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. are you saying that euthanizing animals is only done by PETA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. Never said anything of the sort, are people here saying they don't? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Book Lover
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
63. No one is - but when an organization's agenda is pretty much "Save the Animals!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NM_hemilover
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
74. I just started scrolling thru the responses, so I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Notice this poster didn't say "allowed." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NM_hemilover
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. you're right, he/she said "confined" not allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Not a problem, I was happy to respond. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. From the New York Times: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
80. That's an opinion piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Clear to you, perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #84 |
97. It should be clear to anyone who understands logical fallacies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. I know I can always rely on you for thinly veiled personal attacks, Chode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #103 |
112. Pot/Kettle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 08:11 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. "I have clearly demonstrated their are more than two options." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. There's just one problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. And attacking the animal rights message by screaming about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Not quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. CCF accuses PETA of hypocrisy, and yet CCF is being hypocritical in attacking PETA for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I could care less about CCF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. "I find it hard to believe that they are even attempting to find homes for pets." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
52. The numbers don't bear that out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. You seem to misunderstand the numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:25 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. That doesn't make sense to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Look at "Other" instead of "Surrendered." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:24 PM Response to Reply #79 |
89. Sure, but I'm not sure what you're trying to suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. You've GOT to be kidding here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #94 |
108. I'll thank you not to put words in my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 07:24 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Nice quotes, but where's the support for your claim? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #109 |
120. I think we're almost done here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. This is exactly the "super-secret PETA agenda" that you decry above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Yes, I thought so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. You're unable to admit that your bias is affecting your analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #124 |
129. Four last words, Chode: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #89 |
119. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #119 |
121. Ok, let's run with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
36. IMO links to that site should not be allowed here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Then how about one of Berman's other delightful sites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. Why would a group that is funded by Tyson foods try to discredit PETA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #50 |
70. Why indeed? They seem like paragons of corporate ethics! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. *massive facepalm* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Aw, not this crap again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. This one has posted the same crap numerous times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. TSS appeared previously not to have been suckered by Berman's lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Does Peta euthanize or not? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Yes, but the objection to your link has already been addressed upthread, genius. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. So you object to a link but are not arguing the info from it? I don't check sites all day for who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. "I don't check sites all day for who makes them." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Why not? Sourcewatch makes it easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sudopod
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. Is euthenasia unethical? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. Good point. See the last quoted paragraph in post #28. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. See post #23. Also, when are you registering SheltersKillAnimals.com? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
72. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Cool! Religious practices v. PETA--keep poppin', gang, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think she was smoking in her yard as well, and someone else smelled it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. And all of that could have been overlooked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. She was breastfeeding pit bulls too, wasn't she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. How is this really different from home slaughtering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BreweryYardRat
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. Meh. It was a goat. I've ordered goat in a Jamaican restaurant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. curried goat..yep..having some tonight.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. They kill a goat and eat it and....this is bad. huh. eom for peta |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Yep, if you let Tyson kill your chicken for you, that's bad.If you do it yourself they call the cops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
71. And only if you belong to one of the "scary" religions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #71 |
76. and if you kill hundreds of animals and drop them in dumpsters, that's OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
17. Fuck PETA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. Because? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Because they are going after a woman who is exercising her First Amendment rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #43 |
62. By "going after," you mean asking for an investigation into abuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. Oh, gosh, asking for an investigation? Oh, the humanity!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
98. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:01 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. And if an investigation had revealed animal abuse, what then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. You think this was about animal abuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:51 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. I care about animal abuse, regardless of the origin of the investigation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #107 |
118. If there was abuse, then she should go to jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #118 |
128. And you know that how? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. Puppies? Sacrificing puppies? That's got to be illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Ahem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Then why did the neighbors 'hear the puppies?' n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Because puppies are delicious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. One goat, according to one paragraph of the clear article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. If you've ever heard a goat being slaughtered with a knife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
60. Because they wanted it to be puppies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
21. they heard the "puppies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
61. They don't eat puppies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
29. The PETA hate is strong today...so you're all against someone at least INVESTIGATING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It's a slippery slope, ya know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. I know...let's just assume everything is fine and go on our merry way! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:06 PM Response to Reply #29 |
65. This is about nieghbors bigotry towards a religion they fear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
75. Bulls**t... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. No, it's really not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #77 |
88. Sorry, but if there is any hint of animal cruelty, I say investigate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. The police came out and found nothing wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #65 |
85. RTFA, folks: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
78. You have your legal principles backwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm all for knowing for knowing where your food comes from - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
57. Practicioners of Santeria don't sacrifice puppies, that I have ever heard of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
58. I'm no fan of PETA, but Santeria is bad news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. I strongly disagree with that broad-brush assessment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 10:16 PM Original message |
It may be possible, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #66 |
117. It may be possible, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. And some Christians handle poisonous snakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. I disagree with your perception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
82. So far, this thread has NOT disappointed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. Next Up: PETA's Super-Dooper Secret Agenda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. I read on DU that they (PETA) are terrorists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. Did you hear they routinely poison dogs at dog shows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. When not poisoning them, they open their cages to "free" them from their breeder overlords. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. But surely, one of those "owners" must have called the police? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. You'd think there would be a report somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
126. Bah, who needs pesky facts? We just *know* PETA is bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 02:44 PM Response to Reply #90 |
127. Bingo! I got it in one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. Yup, this thread has a little bit of everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
83. Freedom of religion is a wonderful thing, ain't it? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #83 |
91. Yes, it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shell Beau
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
102. This certainly needed to be investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #102 |
115. I would think you would try talking to your nieghbor first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shell Beau
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
106. I don't see the controversy. They had a meaty meal with religious overtones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
110. Oh, man, this funny!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
111. While I agree with PETA on most issues, I don't on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ardent15
![]() |
Wed Apr-14-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
113. I have no respect for PETA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC