|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Papa Boule
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:53 AM Original message |
Lower Merion students' laptop spy cams "wound up secretly capturing thousands of images" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. There are severmal DUers who owe a MAJOR apology for their behavior on this topic n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kas125
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that if I were you... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:48 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Nor I. But it's comforting to know that Big Brother loves us to pieces. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dotymed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
92. This is exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. have some patience, their still working on their Duke apologies, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
98. You forgot the more recent Toyota apologies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. why's that? there are several DUers who continue to mistake allegations for proven fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Then you are OK with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:16 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. and many DUers have a talent for leaping to unwarranted conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. PLEASE read the posted article and think about the employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. i read the article, & i repeat: some duers have a talent for leaping to unwarranted conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Here we go again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. My thoughts too...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
64. The Philadelphia Daily News published one of the pictures of a kid sleeping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
87. Notice her sudden crickets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Deleted message |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. Yes, indeed, she is, isn't she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:55 AM Response to Reply #87 |
106. yes, it's too bad i can't be at DU 24/7. but you'll find that i did indeed respond, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #106 |
142. Please explain why the school would have pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:49 AM Response to Reply #64 |
104. what conclusion do you draw from that picture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
94. The article PROVES the conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:57 AM Response to Reply #94 |
107. it does nothing of the sort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:41 AM Response to Reply #22 |
135. HB, I have been watching Philly news stations all morning carrying this story- emails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
43. what are you, Du's Mom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:58 AM Response to Reply #43 |
108. no, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
42. i want to know how many people knew about this. sounds like more than the 1 0r 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
102. And one who continues to insist actual admissions are unfounded allegations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:11 AM Response to Reply #102 |
109. I'll respond to just one of your "admissions" because it can be answered quickly without looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:19 AM Response to Reply #109 |
117. Is there a reason you're so obsessed with minimizing this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:43 AM Response to Reply #117 |
119. Is there some reason you're so obsessed with convicting before trial on the basis of "evidence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #119 |
163. Because admitting this is wrong is not something you need a conviction to prove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #163 |
184. you seem to be confused. 1) to say "this" is wrong, you need to know what "this" is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #184 |
187. How about simply admit that what took place was so utterly inexcusable,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #109 |
158. It implied by ommision that only a limited number of images existed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #158 |
179. mentioned numerous times in numerous articles since the beginning of this story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #109 |
162. But how was the play Mrs. Lincoln? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. the one who likes fava beans & chiant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. And just as some of us suspected, it was sordid spying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
35. Although I think this webcam thing was (stupidly) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #35 |
96. "reasonable intentions" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
4. They didn't try using terrorism as an excuse 'cuz they assumed teh fear of DRUGZZzzzz!!! was enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. "I know, I love it" - she needs put in jail for a long period of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. needs put in jail for a long period of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:07 AM Response to Reply #5 |
116. has it ever occurred to you that your conclusions are based on partial information? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
7. "including pictures of Blake partially undressed..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
31. So this server contains child pornography! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Love Bug
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Yet if these kids had sent the same photos by cell phone they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
8. I think I'll kick this before I go to bed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
83. Yes it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Citizen Worker
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
10. But the system was only used 42 times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. So they only spied on stolen laptops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
37. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:22 PM Original message |
teachers also reported THEIR laptops had the camera light go on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. teachers also reported THEIR laptops had the camera light go on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. teachers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. here, w/ links, posted by a duer who lives in the district & whose name escapes me at the moment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. onen of 2 things have happened snce then: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:59 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. they'd be in the same class action already running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:40 AM Response to Reply #65 |
113. it hasn't yet been certified as a class action, so far as i've seen reported. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 05:57 AM Response to Reply #113 |
132. it would be far cheaper for the school if it's a class action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 06:37 AM Response to Reply #132 |
133. the information in the post you responded to indicated that as of late march, it hadn't been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. The teachers spied on are the next bombshell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. I wondered - I always lived in this area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. going public would protect them, and it he union doesn't go ballistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. Here's one, but w/o links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. yes, if you actually read the article, it still is. 42 computers taking a picture every 15 minutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Your P.O.V. is a disgrace... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Deleted message |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
57. Her POV is self-interest. No less disgraceful IMHO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:47 AM Response to Reply #57 |
103. self-interest? how's that? i don't live there, don't work there, & don't work in education, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:39 PM Response to Reply #103 |
152. On what basis do I charge you with "self-interest?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 11:09 PM Response to Reply #152 |
176. oh, brother. i.e., there's no "self-interest" involved except your interest in amateur psychology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #152 |
177. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #57 |
153. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
70. It turned out to be so much worse than you reported originally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MicaelS
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. I think your protestations are fertilizer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:53 AM Response to Reply #33 |
105. what conclusion do you draw from these facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:03 AM Response to Reply #105 |
115. It indicates she believed a truthful answer to all of those questions would incriminate her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:21 AM Response to Reply #115 |
118. Perhaps it "looks" that way because the article reports the claims of the plantiffs' lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:52 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. You broke DU rules by quoting that much of the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:04 AM Response to Reply #121 |
123. i have corrected my egregious violation of du rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:46 AM Response to Reply #123 |
137. Ms. Cafiero, is that you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:04 AM Response to Reply #12 |
36. Is there no misbehavior you will not countenance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
59. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #36 |
110. which misbehavior is it that you believe i "countenance"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #110 |
168. I haven't seen you even suggest that there was anything wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #168 |
180. your remarks imply that you already know "what happened". i believe that's what the preliminary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. Still NOT OKAY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
48. Deleted message |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
49. wow, does this spying fondly remind you of mother russia or something comrade bell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. And again, one wonders why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:37 AM Response to Reply #60 |
127. only if you believe "evidence" consists of allegations made by one party without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
111. gee, unwarranted conclusions, false accusations, & red-baiting -- all in two sentences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
76. You DO realize that the pictures of the kids sleeping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon Apr-19-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #12 |
188. So what number is an acceptable number for children spied on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. except they lied about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
50. female teachers complained about their school-issued laptops, as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Wanna buy a bridge? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
45. 42 thousand maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. PDF doc - plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa Boule
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
39. Thx for that link n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. you're welcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
99. Carol sounds like a turd, but you can't plead the 5th and then answer some questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cal Carpenter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:18 AM Response to Original message |
19. "..wound up..." - what passive panguage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
95. No kidding. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:27 AM Response to Original message |
24. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
28. The school's original defense is shattered now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #28 |
38. +1 ... idiots will still side w/the school irregardless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
79. Original LIES, I think you meant to write. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #79 |
93. I stand corrected. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:45 AM Response to Reply #28 |
114. "apparently now it is clear that they were turning on the cams for any reason" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:54 AM Response to Reply #114 |
138. They have admitted they turned on the cams for LATE FEE PAYMENT, Hannah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #138 |
144. She seems to be assiduously avoiding that particular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #138 |
157. it's not clear what "they admitted," nor does that = "for any reason," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #157 |
159. What DO you say about the illegally obtained photos in the kids' bedrooms, then, Hannah? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
30. I forget, was the terms of this pictorial tracking disclosed in writing and was the activation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:22 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Nope. No disclosure to families. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
51. NO! And they LIED to student s who asked about it. Repeatedly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
54. They also screenshot IMs---no policy on that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
80. No, and no. THERE IS NO DEFENSE. THE SCHOOL PERSONNEL WERE VOYEURS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
40. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
44. Oh yeah right - "The Laptops" did it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
52. The school also screenshot IM communications. So that blows the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
56. Throw everyone of those asshats in jail for a long, long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
62. i'm getting the feeling this is a test case for the rest of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. And how many other school districts have been doing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. probably loads of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
75. Workplaces probably... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #75 |
101. Sorry to tell you this. That fight's been fought and lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:56 AM Response to Reply #101 |
122. What about children, who are legally unable to enter into any contract? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #122 |
140. I have no idea how this was argued at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:00 PM Response to Reply #62 |
77. What makes you think there are some who aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colbertforpresident
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
73. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. Many criminals are "nice" to the world beyond their victims. She's a creepy, lying voyeur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:18 AM Response to Reply #81 |
126. Mandracchia also took issue with Haltzman's use of district e-mail excerpts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
74. Everyone involved should be sued beyond repair... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
100. Don't know the laws in this state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #100 |
148. Could these administrators be sued personally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
78. I'd like to hear from the DU school-defenders right about now. It's called "SPYING." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa Boule
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
82. **UPDATE*** "Substantial number" of webcam photos recovered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. could get dangerous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. What I don't understand is how anyone can defend the actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #85 |
166. you mean the disruptor form lala land? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #85 |
189. Some not only love Big Brother (or Sister), but will defend them here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:22 PM Response to Reply #82 |
89. oh, this is just RICH... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:50 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. During that process the privacy of all students will be strongly protected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
86. Based upon my experiences with school systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:45 AM Response to Reply #86 |
145. Don't think for one minute that private schools are or would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #145 |
173. I agree. My brother attended a private high school and the kids were much worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem mba
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
91. this outcome was 100% predictable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
112. "secretly" ??? Seemed intentional to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:49 AM Response to Original message |
120. inquirer has full text of emails: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:13 AM Response to Reply #120 |
124. Doesn't matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:15 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. that's not the issue the case filed turns on, so i'm not sure which case you're referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 05:22 AM Response to Reply #125 |
128. The whole thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 05:40 AM Response to Reply #128 |
129. no matter how big you type it & how many names you call me, the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 05:47 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. You are either of low IQ or are a deliberate misanthrope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 05:53 AM Response to Reply #130 |
131. the fact that cameras were in your home has no bearing as to *what the lawsuit says*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 06:53 AM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Hannah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #134 |
136. Ms. Cafiero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistler162
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #134 |
141. Since it isn't on the WeirdS**tWebSite then it can't be true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #131 |
139. Who gives a flying eff what You're talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #131 |
143. Ok - I'll bite - say you are 100% right about the case - what do you think about the cameras though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #143 |
182. i've already said what i think about that, several times. no, i don't think schools should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #131 |
146. OK, then. How about you go to your employer on Monday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #146 |
147. You won't get an answer,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #146 |
183. i've never said anything that would in any way suggest i thought it was a good idea for schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #183 |
185. No, it's not unwarranted at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 06:06 PM Response to Reply #185 |
186. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
friendly_iconoclast
![]() |
Tue Apr-20-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #183 |
190. So, when *is* the chocolate ration going to be increased again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:07 PM Response to Reply #130 |
150. "are a deliberate misanthrope" Gotta be the former-even this msanthrope can't support the district. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #150 |
151. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #151 |
154. No tarnish!!! I'm glad for the opportunity to defend misanthropes everywhere! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #120 |
155. Hannah--look at the article you cited. It blows your own points out of the water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. i asked for some evidence the case had been certified by the judge as a class action, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #156 |
161. You have no problem with that system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 06:34 PM Response to Reply #156 |
164. I didn't say anything about class certification. You mixed me up with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 06:36 PM Response to Reply #156 |
165. I didn't write of class certification. You are mixing me up with another poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
149. Just made CNN again a few minutes ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 08:11 AM Response to Reply #149 |
178. I'm glad to hear it's making the major news networks now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
divvy
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
160. Where can I download the pictures of Teenage Girls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
167. Well, hopefully if this ever happens again at any other school anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #167 |
169. It is happening at other schools. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:05 PM Response to Reply #169 |
170. Un-fucking-believable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
171. r- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
172. Based upon my experiences with school systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MkapX
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
174. Schools today america tomarrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MkapX
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
175. laptops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
181. This makes me want to vomit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC