|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:22 AM Original message |
Why do Democrats want to rush through financial regulation?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. For the same reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudohioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. That is really pathetic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. There is a lot of populist anger that nothing has been done and the financial sector is quickly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. Because the Democrats are now in a purely reactive mode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. just so they look like they have a win before the mid term elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Financial regulations have been debated for the past year...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. It's difficult to debate with irrational blind partisanship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I think including cited facts would be helpful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Are you looking for facts?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:50 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. You made a statement in your OP that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. "What is it that you'd like to see that isn't there?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. You haven't given any facts...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. You are playing semantics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:27 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Your statement "Big banks need to be broken up" is really too general..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. What part of "Big banks need to be broken up" do you not understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. So why aren't you aware that the bill provides for this? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Show us the language... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Here..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. You obviously haven't read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Since you have read it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Who's debating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So you're OK with Glas-Steagal not being reinstated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. what was the purpose of Glass Steagall originally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Among other things, it kept deposit banks seperate from investment banks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. and? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. And what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. List the current Investment banks that exist..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. in name or in reality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. My, my, aren't you the imperious one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
13. The Unrelenting Election Cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldenOldie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #13 |
30. Reinstate the Glassman-Steagall Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
22. The greatest danger... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
25. Its time to move on.. they have negotiated enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Will that be good or bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Definitely bad for the GOPers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Move along, move along, better to get things done quickly and expediently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Right ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. They've been negotiating in committee for months.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
38. Kabuki done fast is kabuki done best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-25-10 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
41. Wall Street needs to know post haste that the party where they get to wear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC