|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:23 PM Original message |
Anyone know why Reid voted no on cloture today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because he has to bring up the bill again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. So he has to vote no in order to do so again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinblue
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. here..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good 'ol Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. He did it for a very valid reason. I'll not slam him for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Actually, he was. This way he can force them to vote again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. My guess is it has to do with Senate rules & being able to resubmit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Asked and answered, your honor.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. Procedural. By voting no it allows him to bring it up again for another vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. I see said the blind man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. cause he's expecting a big contribution to his re-election campaign from the bankers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncteechur
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. read much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. As I said to another poster here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Kneejerk much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. NO, I post stuff like that here just so people like you can post a snarky reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Not our fault you didn't read the article first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. LOL... Did I place blame? No need to defend yourself. You are who you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. it's a procedural tactic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
13. I was beaten to it, but the other repliers are exactly right - it's parliamentary procedures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Mon Apr-26-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
17. The only democrat to vote no on cloture was BEN NELSON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC