|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:14 AM Original message |
Does anyone read anymore or just react RE: Arizona. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. What does "REASONABLE SUSPICION" mean? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. that's a VERY well established term in US case law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Pretty much the way I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. actually no. that's not what the bill says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. and reasonable suspicion seems to be what you look like. do you LOOK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
69. as i said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
64. In NYC, random stops are made half a million times a year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Wed Apr-28-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
103. how would an officer in Phoenix have reasonable suspicion that someone is in the USA illegally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. The Tucson Police Chief has questions about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. i agree with him. that's PART of why i think this law is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:51 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Totally agree. And I think this is a law that could easily be abused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
72. Would you say that the Abson was a reasonable 'terry' stop, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
73. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
workinclasszero
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
63. Reasonable Suspicion = Brown skin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
90. It means, "I suspect you are here without documentation. Seems reasonable." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. Let's look a little closer at recent history shall we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The law doesn't go into effect until August |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:41 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Don't let the forest prevent seeing the trees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Read post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. fwiw, federal agents can stop w/in a border zone WITHOUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
11. Based upon what is written here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I'm an American with a Swiss driver's license. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I would assume you have a passport |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I do, of course, have a US passport, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 07:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
43. You'll definitely need a passport when flying between Switzerland and the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:15 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. I have a US passport! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. Yes, you must use your US passport when entering the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. probably a good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
65. Deleted message |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Try reading. It helps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Confusious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Why? Is there some point you wish to make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SargeUNN
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:13 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. You seem to be so intense on the topic I was wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I knew you were going to get at something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Oh one other thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:24 AM Response to Reply #25 |
59. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
84. driver's license is papers. what if you don't drive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #84 |
94. It says ANY STATE or FEDERAL ID. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #84 |
99. If a drivers license is equal to papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:38 AM Response to Reply #14 |
31. IF THE ENTITY REQUIRES PROOF OF LEGAL PRESENCE IN THE UNITED STATES. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
46. Which ones don't? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #46 |
53. I've never shown my birth certificate to get a driver's license |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
67. Deleted message |
pinboy3niner
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #46 |
58. HI, IL, NM, UT, and WA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
41. IF the entity requires proof of legal presence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. So, a person from HI, IL, NM, UT, or WA should carry something stronger in AZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:13 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. That's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #41 |
54. so...as I have an IL license, I need my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #54 |
77. Your Illinois Firearm Owner's Identification Card (FOID) would suffice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickinSTL
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I don't own a gun, and I'm sure not buying one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:14 AM Response to Reply #11 |
36. your missouri license is sufficient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
23. I find it amazing I can be asked to bust out my id to buy a drink when I'm too old to have kids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:12 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. That's because nobody is talking about protecting people that are here illegally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:28 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I'm not white. I'm not Hispanic. I'm not black. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:41 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. What I don't understand is YOUR presumption that anyone is denouncing this law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:03 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. So if the law required everyone to prove citizenship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:47 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. So basically, your argument boils down to it being okay to demand papers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #38 |
61. Pah I just got carded because I ordered a glass of wine on Saturday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Deleted message |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. You got carded because you were buying a drink voluntarily in a state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:41 AM Response to Reply #34 |
49. No local politician could withstand the backlash of good ol' Americans who were randomly stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #49 |
60. You could be Canadian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #60 |
79. Based on the past behavior of the police the previous poster's assessment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. all i can think of is born in east la... cheech gets deported because he doesn't have his wallet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:07 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. I'm sure they are more careful than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:49 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Sure, because everybody is planning on running for President and being attacked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:33 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. i don't know. imagine you look hispanic. now imagine you are being stopped every other day by the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
44. Do you honestly not understand the difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
75. Because you CHOOSE to go buy liquor KNOWING that you will be asked for ID. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:37 AM Response to Original message |
30. Ah.. so you DO need a passport to visit the state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:48 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Doesn't your New York driver's license fall under the category: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:20 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Requirements to obtain a NY Drivers License |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 06:57 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. As part of the application, you must provide your social security card. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
68. Deleted message |
olegramps
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
42. This is an unenforceable law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
47. "Reasonable suspicion" = Dark skin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mstinamotorcity
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
48. The problem with the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
92. Sorry to inform you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demstud
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
50. Don't even need to read the law to know it's bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
56. My ears hurt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
57. The law admits it's stepping into federal jurisdiction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
62. So are you trying to say you support this racist legislation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:35 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. But not the fascist Authoritarian part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. If you do a search... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #71 |
76. I can hear the Jack Boots on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
89. As I told someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #71 |
88. Yes, I have a nuanced position about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #62 |
80. He does have a habit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #62 |
82. That's what it sounds like. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. Time to get the hearing checked nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
93. my hearing is fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. No, you maybe hearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. Confucius |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #62 |
86. What I'm trying to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. Your arguments aren't worth dealing with your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #86 |
98. It would have been easier to just say "yes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. I didn't say yes, did I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:08 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. No, you beat around the bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. No I don't. I never do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KonaKane
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
81. The devil's in the details. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Tue Apr-27-10 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
83. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC