|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:44 PM Original message |
Democrats Introduce Bill Increasing BP Liability Limit From $75 Million to $10 Billion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. why the F was it set at 75 million? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Don't know the full history of it, but I'm sure it was republicans, deregulation, tort reform, etc.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onestepforward
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. St. Reagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Very nice - thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Tony and Clarence will come to their rescue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. can't WAIT to see this come to a vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. +1 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
35. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Okay, then throw the BP execs in the slammer for life. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Hey, don't get draconian on us: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Now we're hearing that the spill will eventually travel up the coast and could damage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my2sense
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. There should be NO LIMIT..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. they should be held liable for however much suffering they inflict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. Agreed. But I'll happily accept significant changes in the right direction, over nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. How do they get around ex post facto constitutional requirements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I think ex post facto only applies to crimes, not damages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
40. They don't. But it sure makes cute press, doesn't it? Almost like they're doing something! (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why is there a limit at all when there's no limit to the damage done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onestepforward
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. BP is "people" now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good, now get the bill passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. 10 billion clams, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
16. Too late for this disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I'm sure they've thought about that. Maybe it just applies to future *claims* or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. No it wouldn't -- see what I posted above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. I don't have time to research it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jdlh8894
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm still betting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
23. why a cap at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I think we're seeing some Dems reveal the newest strategy for passive-aggressive corporatism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Complete waste of time; also, stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
26. Great move! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
29. Why the hell cap it at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Because our government is run by corporations that are physically killing us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gov for sale
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. and the alternative: tax payers obligated to portect oil profits in case of catastrophic spill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon May-03-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I'm no longer surprised at what republicans endorse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
36. You know where that $10 Billion is going to come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. It certainly WON'T come from CEO's bonuses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. exactly. I'm not saying I'm proud do be driving a car right now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arikara
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
38. They should have to pay actual costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
39. kick for BlooInBloo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC