|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:14 PM Original message |
Pro impeachment guys: we need to lobby Nancy. How do we do it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. How to educate an insider . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. I honestly think that Nancy gets it. But, it's her job to herd cats, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. That is interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. I think it is spinning out of control. I think the march was the tipping point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
72. Hold Republican contributor Exxon/Mobil accountable. Boycott them until Bush/Cheney resign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
99. What we'd be asking for is for Exxon to fire Junior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. That's okay. Don't worry about them. Think of this effort as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. some days . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Close your eyes and think of Yossarian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. it really is that absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
67. Anytime I have to paraphrase Queen Victoria, yeah, we're in the zone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
75. Maybe that's why some people choose not to be informed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Don't know how to make people think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good luck on that! Pelosi could care less IMO. It's all about "her." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I respectfully disagree. Nancy has been my very receptive representative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
55. Pelosi may be responsive to you in her district but I don't see much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Again, I respectfully disagree. You couldn't get a more able politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I would love to be surprised. But I won't hold my breath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. "Nancy, set the table." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
101. Yer kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. I share in your concerns... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. fooj, we need to plan an action that works. An action that makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 09:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
79. I hoped the Supreme Court wouldn't select Bush ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Contact your Representatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Nancy is my rep. And while I used to call her office just about every week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Right. You could probably contact Congressmen Conyers and Waxman, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Trifecta. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. You need to start with your Congressman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Thanks for the link, demnan. I'll check it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Send her a copy of the rally Saturday with the true numbers of p.o.ed people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I can't help but think that someone as smart as she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. Move to San Francisco. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Too late! Already here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Oh, good. Did you get in on impeach beach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Proud resident of the letter "H" along with these awesome ladies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. H was my total favorite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. catnapper was in the exclamation point. She wound up next to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. ! was my total favorite, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Lol! You need to move to San Francisco. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiderpig
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 05:33 AM Response to Reply #26 |
106. Just checkin' in, sfexpat2000! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri Feb-02-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Hey, catnapper! It was so good to meet you. San Francisco values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hashibabba
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Contact Nancy Pelosi: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Sure -- we can call and email. But, I'm thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. It may not be that difficult. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. So, we start with Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. If I remember correctly John Dean suggested that impeacing bush would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I'm fine with that. We need 3 reasons to impeach Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. 1: The purposeful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. 3 has to be more concrete -- we know it's true but has to be put in terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
54. treason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Okay but aside from lying us into war and leaking Plame's name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. my big thing with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Is that the one he was shopping for while the Gulf Coast drowned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. A guest on MSNBC's Tucker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. I'm going to run with it on Thursday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
86. As long as the AG goes too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
30. We need to lobby the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Three bullet points, ten are too many for our 5 second attention span. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. We're a hair away from critical mass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Wait -- Halliburton no bid contracts? Conflict of interest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. yeah that all works for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a Constitutional remedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharaoh
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Darn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. Secret Energy Meetings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. We know the dick set us up in that meeting. But, how is it impeachable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. My thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
48. I've got to walk my puppy. THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Regarding H20 Man's 3rd point . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Okay but isn't it being claimed that Junior ordered that? We can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #57 |
78. Dear GOD shouldn't that have been enough in the first place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. Of course! But the problem is to pin it to Darth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. And, as Poi Boy notes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Sure. Now, help me find Item #3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoiBoy
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
52. It's the law... and to not impeach makes our politicians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Agreed. Now, help me find or restate a third item to impeach Darth with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
58. Bury her in letters... I'm not kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. You are so right. I'm thinking about setting this up as an activity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
69. Your Item #3 is the Elephant in Our National Living Room: Torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. But can we hang this on Cheney? Junior is a much easier case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Of course it "hangs" on both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Bear with me, Senator. I didn't know about Addington or managed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Summary of Mora's memo and key players here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Thank you, pat_k. I reserve the right to break out into expletives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
77. Kicking and screaming! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. With ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
82. I don't know. This is the most impeachable administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue Jan-30-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. I don't think it's a matter of convincing Nancy except insofar as we show her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #85 |
90. My faith is on low ebb right now. It's hanging by a thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
87. Need to pin her down on what constitutes grounds for impeachment, and what mandates it. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
88. Can I humbly offer this approach? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #88 |
96. The business analogy does resonate with most people. That's a good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
89. IMPEACHMENT PLATES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #89 |
91. great idea, thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 08:57 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. if you go to a march or some other gathering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #92 |
93. then, gather up the plates, and send them to Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. graphic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #89 |
97. I love this idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Thu Feb-01-07 03:46 AM Response to Reply #89 |
105. God, I LOVE it! What a great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
95. Check this novel idea out, sfexpat: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. Let's do it! If it's okay, I'll put up an action thread this evening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #98 |
103. Have at it, take it away, it's your baby! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. rad fringe put one up here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
100. links to impeachment info with comments from Rep. Maxine Waters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Wed Jan-31-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
102. Nancy cannot be seen as the one behind impeachment because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Fri Feb-02-07 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
108. From another direction..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC