BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:30 PM
Original message |
| Is 'openly gay' not a redundancy? |
|
I've seen it used about 100 times today alone. Maybe it's always used that way, but I didn't notice it until today. But doesn't gay mean, "openly homosexual?" So doesn't "openly gay" mean "openly openly homosexual?"
|
Duer 157099
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I thought "gay" just means homosexual n/t |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Apparently that's what it's coming to mean. |
|
But originally, it meant (correct me if I'm wrong) "out of the closet." It was considered a political act to call yourself gay. It meant you weren't hiding anymore. You were proud and out.
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. "closet gay" is also used a lot... |
|
I worked for a gay couple for many years... one called himself "the happy homosexual" and didn't care who heard him. The other was afraid it would be bad for business if people knew, so he was very much closeted and called himself a "closeted gay" on occasion, meaning he felt forced into the closet.
I tend to use the words people use for themselves... safer I think.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. That's why I'm asking the question, to clarify it. |
|
It struck me as odd when I read it first thing this morning. Then I saw it in an entirely different context later in the day. I'm just trying to get a handle on a word that has changed meaning in my lifetime.
|
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 30. They're just trying to be devisive |
NoNothing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Only bigots use the word "homosexual" |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
It's a cumbersome word, much moreso than "gay" for sure. And clinical. But bigoted? I don't know about that.
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 27. Invariably, BurtWorm. And usually pronounced homoSECCCCCTchewal. |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. From that chewing homo sect? |
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 10. Someone mean told you something mean... |
|
I think.
I've never heard such a thing... and further, I've heard many gay men use the word.
|
NoNothing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. Yeah, well, I've heard lots of black people use the "n-word" |
|
Doesn't mean it's not offensive when I use it.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 17. Now you're just spit-balling it. |
|
It's okay to say "Oh, then I was mistaken." Most people construe such a statement as a sign of self confidence.
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 19. I'm quite sure I would stand corrected when I use it... |
|
Or would be warned not to use it in "polite" company.
I live in Long Beach, CA, where being gay is like being tanned... you are either one or the other or both in this town. We have an amazing annual gay pride parade and festival too.
I'm really quite sure I would be "corrected" on this if it were a problem, or if they thought any of their friends or acquaintances thought it would be a problem.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 15. Third in line to tell you "not true." |
katzenjammers
(147 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 20. Well, the word is technically an adjective, NOT a noun although it's commonly (mis)used |
|
that way. I'm gay and I don't find it to be pejorative although I rarely use it myself except in more or less clinical discussions.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 23. It has a facetious little kick to it, in my experience. |
|
It's such a ridiculously clinical word.
Welcome to DU, by the way. :toast:
|
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 31. Really? Does the same theory apply to homo sapiens as opposed to human? |
|
"Homosexual" is merely an accurate, clinical term. Now if you'd said only bigots use the word "homosexual" followed immediately by the word "agenda", I'd agree with you.
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Gay and homosexual are synonyms. No real distinction. (Gay is preferred) |
|
Edited on Wed May-12-10 04:38 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
The word homosexual is kind of like 'negro' was in 1970 in relation to 'black.' Still in use but approaching being offensive.
|
Duer 157099
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. What I *really* don't understand is the use of "gay and lesbian" |
|
Now to me, that sounds redundant.
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 11. I wonder if that's regional or something... |
|
Because the gay men I know use it all the time.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 14. I don't know many instances of people using the clinical term for the demographic, that's for sure. |
|
I thought (apparently wrongly) that there's the gay population that can be determined because gay people are open to being counted as gay. Then there's the population of "non-gays" if you will which includes an indeterminate amount who might one day become gay--ie., "openly gay"--but who aren't willing to be so counted right now.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 22. Kinda sorta. Problem is that there's no finite definitions here. People exist on a continuum |
|
There's gradations of gayness, or of gay self-identification. Unless it becomes a census item in 2020, there's just no way to concretely say x number of people fit into category A, y number in category B, & so forth. Some people are willing to be counted as gay for a pride parade, but not for work; they'll be counted for a petition, but not for a family reunion; for a church denomination, but not for a local political convention.
Where we stand now, it's really not quantifiable.
|
I Am So Me
(15 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
No, just being gay doesn't mean you're openly gay. There are plenty of people who are gay that keep it secret for fear of retaliation. For example, some people who speak out against homosexuality are actually homosexuals themselves.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Gay doesn't imply being "out" or "open." |
|
Someone can be gay and be in the closet.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 18. I could swear the meaning has changed since the 1970s. |
|
Unless I didn't understand what it meant back then. But I think gay used to mean something like what "out" means now, but there was a kick of pride in it, like relief that you didn't have to hide your identity anymore. It was like a hand being held out to others in the closet to come out and join the movement.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 25. Exactly right. It's a flexible, indeterminative word that rapidly evolves in meaning & connotation. |
|
I don't think you can even get 5 linguists to precisely and exhaustively agree to what the word means.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. It's an emphasizer, like with "Kith & kin" or "Hearth & home" |
|
There are people who are gay on the DL. They self identify as gay, but they keep it a secret at work. That's different than true closet cases where they deny they're gay, maybe even to themselves, but then act out their sexual compulsions with people of the same sex, like Larry Craig. Larry Craig is a straight man who just likes to get his groove on with other men. But he's living the straight lifestyle. That's quite different than my friend H., who is gay socially, but keeps that entirely secret from the people at the hospital he works at.
|
Romulox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. No, it's not. A trip to m-w.com could've answered this as easily as a thread. nt |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 26. It wouldn't have been as fun though. |
|
Edited on Wed May-12-10 05:08 PM by BurtWorm
:P
PS: Dictionaries tend to miss the way some words are actually used. That's for *your* reference.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
Jeffersons Ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 29. no. some gay people are "in the clostet" |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 26th 2026, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message |