|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:22 PM Original message |
I Do Not Support Elena Kagan's Supreme Court Nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. Please expound upon these legal concepts that she was not aware of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. The ranters on counterspin didn't expand on them so I doubt you will get an answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. I will be very surprised if you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. Reply 43 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. Here It Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Not being familiar with one case is equivelent to not being familiar with legal concepts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
61. You've still failed to argue your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
71. Don't bother... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm with you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfcorey1
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. I fully support the President's nominee and feel she is as qualified as the rest of the jurist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
53. How does anyone 'let' Thomas sit there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. I know what is meant. It's freepish to call people stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. I agree, ehr only qualification seems to be "Well, she won't get filibustered." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yeah, it's not like she worked for two presidential administrations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Or she argued a case, or she sat on the bench...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Yeah it's not like she hasn't argued cases in front of the Supreme Court or something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Or anywhere...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Or anywhere...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. After Being Appointed Solicitor General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. funny, people like Professor Lessig and Spitzer think she's qualified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #40 |
54. I'm so sorry...I guess I'm not allowed an opinion, and you are the decider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's sad to see people forming opinions based on unqualified rantings at counterspin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Deleted message |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
70. Yup I agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. Her work on welfare reform delights the centrists and DLC'ers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. She's as qualified as Harriet Meirs for the Supreme Court! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh god, more Glenn Greenwald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. i should have figured it was more of greenwald's bullshit.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
57. Anybody seen Rb McTexas? Just one shy of that brain trust!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. that douchebag?!?!? ooooh, cheap shot dude! ouch! what are you gonna do for an encore, call me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
58. Anybody seen Rb McTexas? Just one shy of that brain trust!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. So Counterspin had Lord High Douchenozzle rant against Kagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
15. Lucky for us you don't get a vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. She's Obama's Harriet Miers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:57 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Please explain how Elena Kagen is in Obama's inner circle as Harriet Miers was in Bush's inner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. glen greenwald told me so!!1!!!1 and i bet chris hedges hates her too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Larry Summers' protege @ Harvard for six years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. That is nowhere near on the scale of the relationship that Miers and Bush had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. It is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. She is his Solicitor General. She has argued, as his DOJ has, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 01:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Total and absolute bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Everything you post is an assault on Democrats & Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Deleted message |
notesdev
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. The record clearly shows that is not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. You accused Sotomayor of being racist. How is that an assault on the oligarchy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
59. And everything you post is a personal attack. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moondog
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
49. + 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Then you should rest easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
56. Came here to post this. Left happy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
27. What legal concepts was she not aware of? Please detail. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. i'll bet she's worried about your support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
34. I guess she just lost... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
36. What legal concepts was she not aware of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Reply 43 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
37. Put up of shut up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Check Reply 43 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. Me neither ~ there were far better candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
45. What "certain legal concepts" was she unaware of?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
52. Yeah, she has a damn thin resume: schooled at Princeton, Oxford, and Harvard Law; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Going to Harvard is about class and personal connections, not intellect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 06:05 PM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Your accusation requires evidence. Her mother and siblings worked as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. What were Obama's personal connections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 06:29 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. That's a steaming pantsload. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
68. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jxnmsdemguy65
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
60. I felt that way at first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
62. You made this decision after watching something called "Counterspin"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
65. Would you categorize her as a left leaning Harriet Miers? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Fri May-14-10 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
72. I have nothing against her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Sat May-15-10 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
73. Well then, I guess that's settled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 21st 2024, 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC