|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:19 AM Original message |
A Brief History of PETA's disgusting sexist campaigns (in pictures) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. It is disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. I believe it's more important to address where and how we get our food than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. So, it's okay for a young girl of 12 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nosmokes
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
104. It's OK for everyone to see these pictures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Deleted message |
arcadian
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Yeah I guess this poster cares more about consenting adults naked in public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
48. I don't give a shit about your cult. Veganism isn't natural. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:23 AM Response to Reply #48 |
56. Hurp durp de durp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #48 |
62. why so vague... how do you REALLY feel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:02 AM Response to Original message |
4. I don't support its "by any means necessary" approach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:01 AM Response to Original message |
6. Apparently they got your attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:37 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Yeah, negative attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
64. So it isn't okay to have anti-war posters with bloody bodies in them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DailyGrind51
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:17 AM Response to Original message |
7. PETA is rather juvenile when it comes to marketing its message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:17 AM Response to Original message |
8. Ah, PETA, I don't think anyone's listening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dems_rightnow
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
9. Why are there arrows pointing to the breasts in #3? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It's pointing to the kids seeing the boobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Oh GAWD!!! Boobies!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. It's also funny since both children are wearing pacifiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm not seeing the sexism or violence towards women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Wow. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mad_Dem_X
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Are you kidding me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:34 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Yep. Have they ever, EVER, used naked, stamped and bloodied men in their ads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
79. Naked and bloodied I have no idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jp11
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
78. There is a post here showing they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
13. peta... pro life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Great catch! Their tactics are the same, so I wouldn't be surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I approve of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
30. they arent challenging pro life. they are embracing, encouraging, validating pro life. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #30 |
42. I think they're just looking for converts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. which is the argument. at the expense of women,.... always. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. I don't understand that last post...? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
18. I think your objections to these ads says more about you, your mindset and your politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 07:50 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Wow, a mind reader who has no fucking idea what he's talking about! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Don't have to read your mind, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. It may say something about a mindset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Where did I say in my post that you must be X in order to be a liberal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Graduate of DU debate I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:26 AM Response to Reply #29 |
58. And you apparently lack reading comprehension, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
93. Now it's reading comprehension. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:40 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Deleted message |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #33 |
57. Typical keyboard commando |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
66. Actually I am not seeing it either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zazen
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
26. the men in PETA photos aren't depicted bloodied or ready for the butcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
27. People focus on the pictures but some of us remember the harassment campaigns that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
31. Who knew Larry Flynt headed up PETA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. playboy, not flynt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. I know a woman who has done many PETA protests, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:43 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. what does you going topless have to do with abuse of animals? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:02 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. not me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
101. Okay, I'll try. What does HER going topless have to do with abuse of animals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Yeah...The message doesn't get the public's attention, the tits do. Which is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. I have have met fully clothed animals rights activists also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
36. These women chose to partcipate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
37. feminist animal activist without have to strip down to be heard, or exploiting one to stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
38. women fucking vegetables ... encourage vegetarian in such a respectful manner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
82. while i agree that using fear and body image anxiety are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. There are very few choices any of us make that are not borne out of societal or cultural forces. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. true, so let me clarify by adding the word "undue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. You could argue that they chose to do this because they've been raised to believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. well, i cannot disagree regarding some of your points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. women fucking veggies and critisim of the pubic hair is about getting attention of men. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. sounds like a significant stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. fucking veggies, discussing pubic hair, anything to get mans attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. again is see your descriptions as slight mischaracterizations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #100 |
107. likewise, must sex for you be about degradation, humiliation, disrespect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. I didnt see anything degrading about the ads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. the point has never been about whether women choosing to do this with their body is wrong. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Ok, with all due respect, what is the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
40. vegans of color |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
41. I understand and accept PETA's anti wearing fur marketing campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:38 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. why did they throw blood on only old ladies and not men wearing leather? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Because it was a fur campaign and not a leather one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
83. probably fear of violent retaliation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
45. K&R. I despise their tactics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #45 |
59. Yep, rec'd again to less than zero... of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
46. Yes. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tonysam
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
47. Some people around here think PETA and HSUS are animal welfare organizations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Um, people are animals, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Hurp durp de durp. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
52. I think these pictures cover a variety of tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
53. Ever seen the segment on PETA on Penn & Teller's "Bullshit" show? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Hurp durp de durp. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #55 |
86. Which means what, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. That I could care less what some washed-up Vegas magicians shilling for CCF and CATO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #88 |
106. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. Well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Tue May-18-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #53 |
115. Penn Gillette is himself full of bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
60. While I'm not nearly as aggro as you are about it, I agree that many of PETA's campaigns are sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Do you really think they are saying women are meat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. They are using patriarchy to make a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Um, strawman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:25 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. How in the hell could this even remotely be called "satire?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. I didn't say it was satire, actually, though I think it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Still not sure what satire has to do with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. So any nudity is women as commodity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Of course that's not what I said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
61. I am neither here nor there with Peta, but none of those pictures bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. great way to end the thread :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #61 |
70. these pics need their own thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. They have one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
63. I like the first ad... a lot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
69. Oh my Gawds! Boobies! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
71. "You don't find that offensive? You don't find that sexist?"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
81. Deleted message |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
90. Queen Victoria called, she wants her sensibilities back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
91. No worse than a thousand other ad campaigns, and this one is for a good cause. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
92. "PETA is a contributor towards violence against women" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
95. Personally I am not offended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
103. Quite difficult to perceive a valid difference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
113. It's absolutely disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Mon May-17-10 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
114. So where's Pam Anderson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC