|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:35 PM Original message |
I know how John Edwards can redeem himself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. He could, but would he? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think he'd do anything he could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. And who the fuck would want/trust him to?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. he has a solid history of going after corporations and WINNING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
50. he hasn't litigated in a couple of decades. He doesn't have the tools or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #38 |
59. Kinda my thoughts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
65. Unlike others.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
39. If he has to be distracted from a case by people who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. What exactly did he do to you to have to obtain your forgiveness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. (In other words -- I Don't Ask For Forgiveness -- With YOU!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
41. tee hee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. As a dem ... he risked getting the nomination, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. If he had gotten the nomination we could have very easily kept that quite, she would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Yes, right. Do you honestly think she would have been allowed to talk? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. talk ....TALK ? Hell she made a freaking sex tape!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. "I'm sure if needed there would have been an accident to prevent her from talking." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. You are suggesting murder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #32 |
55. Pathological lawyer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. It was a Freudian slip - and I apologize to all honest lawyers, including a sister and niece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 11:49 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. I have no ill-will toward lawyers, just thought it was a funny slip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. "and I apologize to all honest lawyers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheManInTheMac
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #32 |
74. "Pathological lawyer." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 11:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. What kind of drugs are you on anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
31. In 2007, the papers knew her name and knew Edwards removed the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. It's not too hard to discredit people enough for them to be dismissed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:56 AM Response to Reply #33 |
43. I have to disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:01 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. So, he would have started more unethical acts, and this is fine with you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
69. Winning is fine with me. I'm not part of DU's little ethics choir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Because you have none. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Sure, it's fine with you until Edwards kills you as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tranche
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
62. Let's see. He was a complete dickhead in seeking the Dem nomination for FUCKING PRESIDENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. I wasn't the one he cheated on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. But his redemption could serve the greater good....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. For heaven's sake, give up on that huge-house-owning, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. So if Edwards wins a huge award from BP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. He'd have to give up the whole award ... you know .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. While that would make me think better of him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Agree completely on that....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #19 |
53. There are all sorts of ways to serve one's country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. the billboards are already up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. This would be a great time to institute limits on the lawyers take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. Nope... doesn't wash away his faithlessness in his wife's hour(s) of need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. FWIW, who would give up the perks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. John Edwards needs to pull a Gary Hart and disappear for a long while....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Unless he has something useful to offer .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Indeed.. he needs to be as PRIVATE as possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKHumphreyObama
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 02:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Gary Hart wasn't half as bad as JE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
12. a can of worms no one needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DatManFromNawlins
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. The only way for him to redeem himself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Oh now thats a good one ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
66. Oh hahahaha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
30. Wrong person to lead the effort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Well....good point ...still believe in redemption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. You should not rely on trust to make a decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #35 |
60. I agree, I would always examine an idea or statement and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sun May-23-10 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
36. Use his hair to plug the leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. bwahahahahaha - that was a perfect response! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:09 AM Response to Reply #36 |
46. I know what would really plug the leak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
45. No. We need the trial to be about BP, not about John Edwards, which would be the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
47. I think as a Democratic voter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SayitAintSo
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Agreed ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldlib
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
48. I have always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:50 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I've always considered him to be a sleaze bag of monumental proportions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldlib
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Sex is a powerful factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:50 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. I'll cast all the stones I feel like casting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:11 PM Response to Reply #48 |
67. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
49. uh, bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
54. I really don't care what he does... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
57. He can't lead if no one will follow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pisces
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
58. If he still cares about getting the public's forgiveness, he deserves none. He should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
71. That may be hard for him to do from jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
73. Why forgive him or care if he redeems himself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC