bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-14-10 11:33 AM
Original message |
| New Info in CREW Lawsuit Reveals 89.4% of Bush-era E-mails Were Never Archived (6-14-10 CREW) |
|
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/45182I connect this to several archived DU threads, like seafan's March 26, 2007 thread below. "Subpoena SUSAN B. RALSTON. She holds the key to WH e-mail systems, election night '04 and Abramoff" http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x505855What are your thoughts on this today, DU?
|
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-14-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Susan B. Ralston Source Watch profile |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-14-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Gee, isn't that a violation of federal law? |
|
Good thing we're lookin' forward to the future, and not backwards to the past so we don't have a long national nightmare over holding people accountable for malfeasance in office. At least until 2013 or 2017, when we'll all be very interested in what-all went on in the White House, with the most sinister and unfriendly spin that can be mustered.
|
hootinholler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-14-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. It's not clear that there are actual penalties associated with that law. n/t |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-14-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Oh, we'll find out all about the penalties if the GOP takes power again |
|
And it might be surprising how severe they are for unauthorized deleting of a "Kitty of the Day" e-mail.
|
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-15-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-16-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |