|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:33 PM Original message |
Private landowner closes century old trail to public water falls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. The western version of "Get off on my lawn", apparently nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
53. I stopped reading at "Bonsall, whose father built a real estate empire" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. People in california are more worried about litigation than any other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jkid
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Then people wonder why the kids turn to drugs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
77. Connecticut Law relieves a private landowner of liability if a Hiker is hurt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. two words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Adverse possession, more likely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Not in CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. No, adverse possession would require actual possession, not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. The public probably have a case for an easement right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Camino Real (The Royal Road) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. That is an old concept in common law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Adverse possession type laws are very much alive in Florida. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. The Forest Service should be a new trail that skirts the edge of Bonsall's property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:32 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. Put the paving a couple inches off his property line, just to piss him off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
49. Way to respect private property there. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 04:41 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Way to defend feudal lords there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 10:33 AM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Some guy that owns some land... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:54 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Statist? As in Ayn Rand's (in)famous label? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
79. "Some Guy" may own land |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. When "treasures" are sold to individuals, this is what happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. The falls and water are public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. He has a right to keep people off the property. The forest service needs a new trail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
46. Old traditional law might differ on that point, recognizing a right of access |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Option 1: Create a new, safe passage from a different access point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papadog
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Option 3 Exercise "Eminent Domain Laws" for the good of the Taxpayer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Not sure it would pass court muster at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
70. Eminent domain would be an incredibly expensive option in this circumstance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
74. Access from another point isn't much of an option either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 06:34 PM Response to Reply #74 |
83. Its already considered a tough hike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
howaboutme
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
35. Wait folks!!! This is only the start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. They are going to have to helicopter in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Wow - that is gorgeous! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Five Man Electrical Band - Signs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. haven't heard that song in a really long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I always loved that song. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TransitJohn
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. This sort of thing happens often where I live. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. People can be pigs. I've seen families get up from a picnic in the park and leave trash right where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. Frankly, I sympathize with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. yeah, I really do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Best choice is alternative access |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
65. Cigerette butts are the worst - especially if there hasn't been rain in a few days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trachimbrod
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. The slobbiness of American turds can hardly be underestimated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 09:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. No need to do eminent domain- the public already "owns" an easement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:35 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. It wasn't an official trail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 06:30 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Offical has nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
72. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
76. A prescriptive easement may not apply here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tikki
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. It really is a beauty in a somewhat baron (sic).. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well, I am in a similar situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
25. I don't know about CA, but in Florida this would be one hell of a court battle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Then would the landowner be relieved of any lawsuits if someone's hurt there? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. An easement classification would hold the property owner fully responsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I don't like that solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Bet the current owner would fund all/part of it as a write off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Responsible for WHAT??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I wish what you say were true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Every time I have looked into those cases, they were "booby trap" cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:52 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. I am painting with a bit broader brush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 10:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Cutting off the trail is going to cost the client money to litigate the easement claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. To get an Easement by Prescription, you have to hold yourself out as having the easement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #54 |
61. You need to open up Witkin or have a look at one of the CEB's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 11:14 AM Response to Reply #61 |
69. I am giving basic easement by prescription law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
52. Could the owner put up signs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Signs alone are never enough. Signed releases are not even ironclad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. What that implies is of course disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. No, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Thanks for the info. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
82. Some states, Connecticut for example, remove the landowner's liability. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Tue Jun-29-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Land and water law is dramatically different between the east and the west |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Township75
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
34. How about we discuss what is good for the environment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun Jun-27-10 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
47. He's going to lose that case based on the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
63. Frankly I don't blame this guy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
64. It's easy to vilify this person but honestly, I can't blame him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
80. A state can fix the lawsuit aspect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Tue Jun-29-10 09:46 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. That's up to California to make those laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RT Atlanta
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
66. Prescriptive Easement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dank Nugs
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
68. I really hate greedy assholes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bl968
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
73. This is what Eminent Domain was made for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
75. I can't say that I blame the man after I've seen some of the beautiful places |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee
![]() |
Mon Jun-28-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. The worst is hiking up a ledge of basalt to find grafitti. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 04:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC