|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:35 AM Original message |
If you had your own political website, how would it be different from DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. Men's issues would be as worthy of discussion as Women's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. You forgot your Sarcasm smiley there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Take it to the men's forum. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. No, thanks. You introduced it here, so here's where I commented. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #44 |
66. Uh... There is no men's forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Never looked for one. Never missed it, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. It was a discussion a couple of weeks ago - a man posted about the need for a men's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. In what way are women in the US downtrodden, under-represented, or abused? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Ha! You don't know? Well, never mind then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #75 |
92. There are absolutely mens forums on the internet. Lots of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #92 |
121. Well, I'm no expert on men's forums. I'm a member of a couple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #121 |
130. I get boat building stuff at boating forums. I get workshop stuff at workshop stuff forums. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #130 |
132. Well, then, I suggest that you fire up a men's forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #132 |
138. Actually, I like debating things with DU'ers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:24 AM Response to Reply #121 |
170. The anti-feminist men on DU should try out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
88. Yikes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #88 |
122. DU is not my site. I have nothing to say about how it is run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
126. I think that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. OK. That's my prerogative, isn't it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:48 AM Response to Reply #127 |
159. Obviously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:26 AM Response to Reply #88 |
171. If there are DUers who really want a men's forum, just go about asking the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #171 |
180. The rules have been followed each time it's been asked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #180 |
182. I never was good at the childhood game Mother may I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #68 |
91. If fungus infections are a topic of interest, I suppose so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:13 PM Response to Reply #91 |
125. Seems to me you could do that already on DU. Lots of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 10:10 AM Response to Reply #66 |
181. Didn't know quite where to jump in on the subthread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #181 |
188. DU has a different architecture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #188 |
210. Actually, it was the same structure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. Hahaha. All issues are men's issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
102. I am demonstrably right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:52 AM Response to Reply #102 |
160. I would have no problem with it. I think there are issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:34 AM Response to Reply #102 |
175. In the past the entire world has been the mens forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. plus 5 insightful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Are you guys really serious with this stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
64. The question was asked how I'd operate New-DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. It makes you blind, that's for certain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #65 |
79. how so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #79 |
84. How would one "assume" they were not on this forum? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #84 |
96. How is that explanatory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:44 PM Response to Reply #84 |
190. my post was directed at #65 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:27 AM Response to Reply #79 |
172. Lol, not even close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #64 |
82. Hmm...your list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #82 |
93. You do realize that explaining why women's problems are of their own creation wouldn't fly here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #93 |
117. Nobody has asked me to do that. You posted a list of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #93 |
118. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:26 AM Response to Reply #82 |
163. I think you inadvertently pointed out why it might be a progressive idea to have a men's forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #163 |
164. and that would be profoundly the higher intent of such a forum.... or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:34 AM Response to Reply #164 |
165. So we police it to keep it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:37 AM Response to Reply #165 |
166. i can really see it as an attempt to health and healing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
120. I'd like to see links to those numbers, from a reputable source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #120 |
133. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #133 |
194. Thanks. Off to read. Yes and no, agree and not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #194 |
195. You seem to be disagreeing with something I didn't say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #195 |
196. Women make less, are laid off less. Not arguing with your #'s, just saying one statistic doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #196 |
197. One statistic doesn't portray it all. The assortment in post 64 begins to paint a clear picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #120 |
189. One correction; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
109. There are two Christian boards here on DU and Christian privilege definitely exists in the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:22 PM Response to Reply #109 |
111. Good example. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #109 |
149. those boards are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 03:25 AM Response to Reply #149 |
152. I am not talking about R/T, which is a great board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #109 |
173. No, but those who generally advocate for a men's forum on DU cite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #173 |
186. I agree with you that men are not second class citizens in the US. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #186 |
187. Well that's good -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
147. Well no one is supposed to care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'd add casual Fridays. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
3. If it were a political site, it would be party agnostic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
61. Don't those types of sites usually degrade in mindless flames though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #61 |
104. Yeah, and although the debate would be open |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. I couldn't come close to being what DU is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. Restore freedom of expression. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. Would you have mods at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
56. slashdot has the best moderation system on the intarwebz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sir pball
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #56 |
203. +10e100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
113. Yup, I'd get rid of most of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
6. Free Toilet Paper for everyone!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. So, it's basically "Survivor", but with free TP.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. I would not tolerate bigotry. Racism and homophobia would be unacceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
32. What about faith? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
108. Should faith be protected class? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 02:19 AM Response to Reply #108 |
150. catholics are born christian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
110. What is faith? An opinion with no proof? Do opinions need to be protected? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #110 |
116. If you believe in the Constitution, then yes, faith is protected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #116 |
119. No, the PRACTICE of faith is protected, not faith itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. Yes, that is correct, and what I took the poster to be referring to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:33 PM Response to Reply #123 |
148. Why do you see it as a personal attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #148 |
183. When people don't see their own attacks, and go around accusing others of being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:47 PM Response to Reply #183 |
191. So what are you saying? Religion should be "off-bounds?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #191 |
193. OMG... are you really that obtuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #193 |
199. Judging from your responses in the environmentalism thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #116 |
131. We were talking about message boards' rules, not the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
107. And classism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:02 PM Response to Reply #107 |
114. I guess not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Can only be on the site if you're nude ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
179. link please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riverdale
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
9. no one banned for any reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
27. We all live forever - in a Tombstone free world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoGOPZone
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
67. Even if someone posted "Tombstone me right the fuck now!"? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. We'd have hearts all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Then here are some hearts for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
157. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
11. It would be in pig-latin only to scare off the fundies. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
14. It would have folded long ago, just like so many have done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Kinda what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
63. Yah. Lots of people start up discussion forums. Often, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
15. I would allow sex threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Maybe we could ask Skinner for a DU Group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CLANG
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
16. I would be in charge of Tombstoning - and I would be BRUTAL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
17. I'd ban any opinion buy mine. Yessir, a majority of one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
18. Feminist friendly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uncommon
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Amen to all of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
19. I would insta-ban everyone who advocated not voting for Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. That gets into a slippery slope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Insta-ban everyone who advocates voting for Bernie Sanders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Except, of course, for Charlie Crist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. Insta-ban everybody who campaigns for Charlie Crist too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. And before you ask, insta-ban anyone who advocates against Alvin Greene too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. You're gonna be awfully lonely at your new website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. And yet I would probably have enough people on it to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
70. Would you now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. I endorsed Lamont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Fanciful critiques of Lamont supporters notwithstanding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #80 |
99. And against a Republican too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:02 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. I don't really remember posting that though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
21. If I had one it would suck. So I don't have one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
25. Arguing against reproductive choice would be grounds for a ban hammer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
31. mmmm... it'd have no posting priveleges for anyone but me :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. less censorship. make that NO censorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. +1000000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evasporque
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. Require real names.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #37 |
51. It would also terminate the employment of a lot of good people who post here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
38. I already have two such websites - sort of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
39. No recs or unrecs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #39 |
134. I agree with everything except the recs and unrecs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:55 PM Response to Reply #134 |
140. Recs and unrecs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #140 |
146. Meh. I think it's MUCH ado about nothing. I don't pay any attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:47 AM Response to Reply #39 |
158. yah, unrecs are Duummmb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
40. For one, I would allow this thread to continue unlocked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. You really think they'll lock this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Eventually, it will make someone nervous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #52 |
135. Except that the admins have recently said they want to make the site better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
43. I would reflect both rec and unrec totals and I wouldn't allow advertising for Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. You are welcome, Uncle Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveEconomist
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
87. Agreed. And I'd find a way to limit the daily number of unrecs fron any one member, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
45. I'd ban anybody who used the words "epic fail" as a reply to a post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You could have gone with, "Heroic Fiasco". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
47. 325% Less Complaining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:53 AM Response to Reply #47 |
161. yah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
potassiumnitrate
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
57. About 99% of everyone here would've been banned by yesterday (nm) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
60. I wouldn't lock sex threads. More better sex threads is what we need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
62. I'd make more use of the marquee and blink tags |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
69. It would be for actuall left-wingers, not Blue Dogs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:42 PM Response to Reply #69 |
94. Odin, someday you will get your wish and Skinner will TS me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
71. I'd call it Working Class Underground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
74. The same, only no Free Traitor, Laissez-Fail Reaganomic advocates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
76. My site would be EXACTLY like DU aside from one difference: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
77. I would have a really good taco stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #77 |
95. Would it serve beer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
81. No bulletproof trolls. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #81 |
103. THIS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backwoodsbob
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
83. it would basically be DU EXCEPT I would be a naughty mod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
98. Love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Control-Z
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #83 |
198. Best idea yet!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
85. My site would focus on "Issues Advocacy" instead of "Party Advocacy." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
86. Zero tolerance for furries. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #86 |
128. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuntcat
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:56 AM Response to Reply #86 |
162. oh noooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
89. I'd add a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
90. I am content with DU as it is, I have no complaints...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dimbear
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
97. Give any poster with 10,000 posts a sparkling new energy efficient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 12:22 AM Response to Reply #97 |
200. As long as it is American made in a Union shop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
100. Well, it'd probably be pretty lame, full of vulgarities, and not well-maintained. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
105. Anyone who was consistently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
106. I wouldn't publish PMs in the public forums |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
112. I'd add one forum that has no rules: The Sandbox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:03 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. I thought about suggesting that to Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #112 |
129. any rules? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
124. up the ease for written expression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
136. I would TS all the Blue Dogs - especially those from Nebraska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #136 |
144. As I knew you would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:48 AM Response to Reply #144 |
178. Nah, I'm not a native Pennsylvanian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
137. It wouldn't be party oriented.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
141. More soup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. ..and a salad bar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
142. I Would Beam It Directly To Your Cerebral Cortex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Wed Aug-25-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. You need to go do that over in Freeperville |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 02:56 AM Response to Original message |
151. Lol, it would have the same kickass fully threaded format, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #151 |
204. It sounds very relaxing...except the fight club |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
153. I'd have a serious uptake in choices of local beers, pus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:28 AM Response to Original message |
154. I'd give everyone a special sparkle pony of their very own... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #154 |
169. Awwwwww....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:23 AM Response to Original message |
155. I'd prevent anonymity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:22 AM Response to Reply #155 |
168. Seriously, that could get a lot of people fired from jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:34 AM Response to Reply #168 |
176. Probably, but "my own political website" wouldn't be nearly as big as DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LLStarks
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
156. More common sense progressivism. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
167. Mods there just for policing personal attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #167 |
174. I think they have to be there to patrol for copyright violation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 08:42 AM Response to Reply #174 |
177. Yeah of course the place needs to protevt itself against legal violations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
184. Deleted message |
jgraz
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #184 |
185. Sigh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #185 |
201. I have no idea.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Troop
![]() |
Thu Aug-26-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
192. Before you could post, you'd have to acknowledge my divinity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #192 |
202. In order for that to happen, you would need to prove your divinity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
205. It'll be all Hate Mail Bag and Top Ten Conservative idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmahaBlueDog
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #205 |
207. That's the first time I've seen the term "Vanity Post" here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #207 |
217. A "vanity post" is anything that'll generate letters to the Hate Mail Bag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Metal
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #205 |
209. That's great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
206. Sex threads... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 08:59 AM Response to Reply #206 |
208. Deleted message |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #208 |
211. Did you know that there was a sex-thread site like five or six years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #211 |
212. so?? shruggin. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #212 |
213. Would you accuse those women of having this same elaborate set of motives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #213 |
214. do you still beat your wife? this is not what i am addressing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #214 |
216. Sorry, I responded to the wrong post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 11:14 AM Response to Reply #213 |
215. What would you see as the difference between the two sites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Fri Aug-27-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
218. You could call Ann Coulter a ****. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC