|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| ORDagnabbit
|
Fri Sep-03-10 05:43 AM Original message |
| Beaverton wont fund a 4th of July celebration but will fund a Mexican Independance day celebration |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheCowsCameHome
|
Fri Sep-03-10 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Well, isn't this nice. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gophates
|
Fri Sep-03-10 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Whatever |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 11. Well, there is the book section controversy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pampango
|
Fri Sep-03-10 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. "Beaverton decided to promote Mexico's 200th anniversary celebrating independence" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Yeah, and? Aren't the Poles, Russians, Italians (no, CC Day doesn't count), and French welcome? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ThomasQED
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 28. There's a Bastille Day celebration in Portland every year |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 50. "Festivals" for heritage are not the equivalent. But if Portland pays for a Bastille Day event, well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 53. Huh? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kcks
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Then |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Okay, this is just bizarre and wrong. At least the Mex. consulate can pay! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nuclear Unicorn
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. I wonder if they've had to lay-off any city workers or teachers or cutback services |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. Schools aren't funded out of city coffers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Odd. I'm pretty sure some of my property tax adjustment is suggested |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 19. A percentage of property tax goes to fund education. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:36 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. My response was to this: "Schools aren't funded out of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| proud2BlibKansan
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 44. And those tax dollars go to the state |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Sat Sep-04-10 06:42 AM Response to Reply #44 |
| 60. And if the local school board makes a special assessment for one |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Sat Sep-04-10 07:34 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 64. You are correct, of course. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. Wrong. Local property taxes fund schools. THAT is why the US has run-down schools and Taj Mahals. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 20. . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Sat Sep-04-10 08:06 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 66. Fine. We BOTH were incorrect (you just said "schools", not "Oregon's schools"). |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Sat Sep-04-10 08:17 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 69. That's the consequence |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dsc
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 55. it actually depends upon the state |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nuclear Unicorn
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 15. but you se my general point though, right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. Is that why they didn't have a 4th celebration? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nuclear Unicorn
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:09 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 21. Very short on specs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Sat Sep-04-10 07:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 63. I'd need the specs to judge, but I think that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rage for Order
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 27. They only fly American flags on July 4? No other day? That's odd |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Sat Sep-04-10 07:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 62. I assumed that "flags up" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LWolf
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Based on the responses so far, shall I assume that DU |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Those are good also, especially when funded by the group involved. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:47 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 16. To the exclusion of AMERICAN Independence Day celebrations? Yes, I DO object. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gratuitous
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. If Lars Larson and Bill O'Reilly are upset about this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. Oh boy- more race baiting and xenophobic responses to local events people know nothing about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nuclear Unicorn
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 29. Where's the anti-Hispanic sentiment? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 30. Did some people also wonder about the city's funding of a St. Pat's day event? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nuclear Unicorn
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 31. A fair response to fair questions |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 36. If you'd ever lived in or near the community, you would know the nature of the media |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ORDagnabbit
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 33. I dont understand your response. Are you happy a city wont fund a celebration of our own |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 52. I don't give a shit. The residents of Beaverton can access 3 celebrations within |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ORDagnabbit
|
Sat Sep-04-10 04:50 AM Response to Reply #52 |
| 57. I live up here so I dont know daly city. Does daly city promote and throw a party for another |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Sat Sep-04-10 05:35 AM Response to Reply #57 |
| 58. Mexican-Americans are taxpayers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ORDagnabbit
|
Sat Sep-04-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #58 |
| 70. and so does every other legal american hence you pay for our independence day celebrations before |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dembotoz
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. just could it be that traditionally someone else funds the 4th of july |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. Beaverton is 7 miles from Portland which has several 4th of July events. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 25. Oh no! The city of Beaverton also kicked in for a St. Patrick's Day celebration! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kctim
|
Fri Sep-03-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 37. Fair enough, I guess |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DeschutesRiver
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 54. There used to be quite a few in Portland |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fishwax
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. Sounds like a fun event. Way to go, Beaverton. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bullwinkle428
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 32. Word - I'm sure the food will kick ass, compared to the lame stuff |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ORDagnabbit
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 35. Being from a military family my first response is to tell you to suck it. But thats just my emotions |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fishwax
|
Fri Sep-03-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 39. You want to tell me to suck it because I think the event sounds fun? Weird. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. There are 3 large events in the area on the 4th. One bills itself as the largest |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Fri Sep-03-10 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 34. Only $5000 for Cinco de Mayo, vs. how much for 4th of July? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 47. Way to miss the point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Luminous Animal
|
Fri Sep-03-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 51. No. That is precisely the point. Nationwide there is only 14,000 local displays... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Sat Sep-04-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 65. Well, hey: Hang a Guy Fawkes effigy on 11/05 and it'll be cheaper yet! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arugula Latte
|
Fri Sep-03-10 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. It's for Mexico's BICENTENNIAL. That happens, let's see, uhh, ONCE. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Fri Sep-03-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 40. Mexico should by all means celebrate. It's like the old (bad) joke "Do they |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 45. Wow- hard to believe I'm on a progressive site sometimes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 48. Do these places also NOT celebrate 7/04? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Sat Sep-04-10 08:08 AM Original message |
| dupe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Sat Sep-04-10 08:08 AM Response to Reply #48 |
| 67. Have you not gotten a clue and been embarrassed enough yet? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Sat Sep-04-10 04:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 56. On the one hand we read that a community will not fund a July 4th |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| depakid
|
Sat Sep-04-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 68. So in your world, public agencies should have no role in cultural events |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Sat Sep-04-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #68 |
| 71. A role in hosting, organizing. Not funding. If a group (any group) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SoCalDem
|
Fri Sep-03-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. Beaverton HAS a Mexican Consulate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| proud2BlibKansan
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 43. Right wingers as well as plenty of DUers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Quantess
|
Fri Sep-03-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 46. True, that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nadinbrzezinski
|
Fri Sep-03-10 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. I'll be down there for that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Swamp Rat
|
Sat Sep-04-10 05:48 AM Response to Reply #49 |
| 59. Yo quisiera ir también, pero no puedo. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Regret My New Name
|
Sat Sep-04-10 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 61. Weird to see Beaverton in the national spotlight |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 20th 2026, 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC