|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:14 PM Original message |
Payroll tax cuts = intensification of campaign to "reform" SS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's sure what it looks like - there's a knot in my stomach. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. I actually had that thought, but *oof* I thought I was being too cynical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. CHECKMATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. ugh. rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Reich: Eliminate payroll taxes to improve economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. This is not what he is proposing. Actually, what he is proposing is progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The payroll tax holiday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Reich is not proposing one without the other. This is the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. So you like regressive taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. This is very important. Recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yeah, and next they will want that permanent. As one of my friends says live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. That is only true if they don't transfer the 120 billion from the general fund to the trust fund. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. They are *obligated* to buy back SS bonds if collections fall short, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crystal Clarity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. Why didn't they just lift the cap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-10 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. defund & destroy. hey! worked for other government programs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 26th 2024, 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC