xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:09 PM
Original message |
| so do i have this right -- the bush tax cuts -- which created no jobs |
|
and can be linked directly to the disasterous economy we all live in now -- are a good thing and will create jobs -- um - because a dem prez signed off on them?
moderates seem to want to do to 'progressives' and the 'progressive movement' what reagan did to 'liberals'.
|
OhioChick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yep...That about sums it up n/t |
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Tick tock, tick tock.
Unbridled corporatism works? PROVE IT!
So how will the GOPigs spin the non-job creation even AFTER we give the rich what they want? Still think they'll admit error? Neither do I.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. The top 2% don't create jobs, but apparently the middle class cuts and credits for the poor |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 PM by emulatorloo
do create jobs. Per the Obama advisors -- those people spend the money they get back in taxes on goods and sevices. Which is stimulative, That's the theory anyway, it is not how you characterize it.
So the idea is that economic growth would slow down if middle class and below did not have this money to buy things.
Still sucks though that the top 2% are getting the cut.
|
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Sort of. They're better now because they were extended due to 'bi-partisan cooperation'... |
|
...if by using 'bi-partisan' you mean "doing whatever the fuck the republicans tell you to do and then rolling over to have your tummy tickled"...so yes, you are right...
|
GrpCaptMandrake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We talked about this last night on The H.O.R.N.
Over all the long, tortured, tormented, nightmare years of the DimLeader Administration, these very tax cuts didn't create a SINGLE job. Not.One. DimSon finished his presidency with jobs in negative numbers.
Now, however, we are supposed to believe that the same failed strategy will suddenly work. The emphasis is on the word "believe," the most dangerous word in the English language. It's Tinkerbell Economics, writ large.
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Tax cuts for the rich, which are UNPAID for and increase the deficit. |
|
All the while trying to find a way to CUT Soc. Sec.
The loss of revenue with these tax cuts could have paid for SS for the NEXT 100 YEARS!
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Yes. DLC/NDC is anti-progressive and pro-neocon. |
Goblinmonger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. Amen. The prove it louder and more obnoxiously every move. n/t |
leeroysphitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Abracadabra! Presto chango! Tax cuts for the rich are now a good thing. |
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
denem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. NO!. The Bush Tax cuts are worth $383 billion |
|
the those under 200/250K
Pull that out of the economy plus $120 billion in unemployment benefits
=$500 billion king hit (the Recovery package was only $ 780 billion)
Yes the economy can easily stand +$75 billion on the top 2%
NO THE ECONOMY CAN NOT STAND MINUS 500 BILLION ON 98% OF TAX PAYERS AND THE UNEMPLOYED.
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-07-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Who said they were "moderates"? |
|
They're hardcore Reagan Righties. There's nothing "moderate" about them. They use the term in the same cynical way that they've used "liberal media".
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message |