|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:51 PM Original message |
For all of you who think Coakley will lose because she's for this healthcare bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Teddy Kennedy would not have supported HCR as it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's not my question. If he DID, which I think he would, would he lose the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. he would not have supported this piece of shit, period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. You can't answer the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. it's BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The premise is a hypothetical! IF he supported it would he lose the election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
48. I cannot even BEGIN to imagine he would support this piece of garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
67. Well, his WIFE disagrees with you. You're giving a cop-out response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
55. it's sick that you think you know better than his widow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
57. insuring 30 million americans is not a piece of shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Ted Kennedy never took the voters for granted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. he LISTENED to us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The majority of MA voters support the current bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. No, they do not, you are mistaken, and very much so... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Rasmussen the REPUB. pollster has MA approval of the bill at 52% approve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. ahem, suffolk last week has these numbers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. I actually think that Coakley will win in a squeaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. OK then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
27inCali
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. you nailed it on the head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 08:28 AM Response to Reply #31 |
81. That has been my thought all along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. That is pure bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. he would not have suppported it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. So you don't believe his wife? Do you know better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. So your guess is better than the Kennedy Family opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
27inCali
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
40. why are you so certain of yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Bullshit. Bernie Sanders, John Kerry, Barbara Boxer and other supports it, and so would Kennedy. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
69. Bingo. His wife said so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. BULLSHIT!! How can you speak for a man that's dead and can't speak for himself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
59. Isn't that what the OP is doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. How am I speaking for Kennedy? I asked a hypothetical question. That's all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. His wife has said he would support it, but you know better, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. His wife and Senator Kerry have both said he would and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. So everyone that says he would have supported it is a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
53. his wife says he would have. you have to wildly arrogant to think you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. His wife Vicki supports it on his behalf. That is good enough for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
73. Bullshit He would have voted for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 01:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
75. He would have voted for it without a doubt. Like every member of the Democratic caucus did. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 07:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
80. that's pure fantasy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
83. Just like he never would have supported No Child Left Behind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. We lose cuz times are bad. The rethugs at some level MIGHT have given us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. That's why I think she's going to win by 10 points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yeah, I hope so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. no ted wouldn't have lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. You honestly think Teddy Kennedy would have let this crap bill emerge like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Of COURSE! Do you think YOU know better than his WIFE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Oh so this is the bill he wanted? YEAH SURE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I didn't SAY this is the bill he wanted. But he'd be for it because it's a start-and his wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. He would have given us a stronger bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I believe Ted's wife knows better than what you "believe with all your heart." Can you answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Wed Jan-20-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
85. Who sheparded No Child Left Behind through the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. That's not logical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. She was a very popular AG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
26. so why do you think coakley is struggling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Poor campaigning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
29. Brown leads Coakley by 30 points among 18 to 29 year olds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I don't believe that poll for a second. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Because you don't want to believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Because it makes no sense. It also said something like 25% of Black people support Brown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. MA already has mandated health insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. And? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. WHOA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 01:46 AM Response to Reply #29 |
76. Um, no more than the 2008 election was. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
35. On the phone calls I made, health care wasn't the issue. I talked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
49. Brown's campaign knocked on my door twice. Coakley's didn't at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
50. Why didn't Ted Kennedy do anything to pass health care in his decades in the Senate ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
52. if Ted Kennedy had died before the 2008 Primary started there would be people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
58. Martha Coakley is no Ted Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Good. So you DON'T think Coakley's support of this healthcare bill will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 08:32 AM Response to Reply #62 |
82. I didn't say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usrbs
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
63. She's the establishment candidate now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
64. I would've thought that Kennedy would've learned from the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
65. Thats not logical at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
66. Deleted message |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Idiotic post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 06:29 AM Response to Reply #70 |
79. thank you - it was intended to be idiotic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadesofgray
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
68. I don't think that's why she'll lose. I think she'll lose because she's a piss poor candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Mon Jan-18-10 11:32 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. She is not going to lose. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. What makes you so sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
72. Can you really be this naive? Yes, he may well have lost (course, there would be no vote til 2012) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
77. We'll find out a lot with the exit polling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
78. HCR as it now stands is a millstone around the neck of all Democrats. Teddy was a strong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Tue Jan-19-10 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
84. Teddy was an institution. Everyone knew him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC