Mika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 04:29 PM
Original message |
| Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. |
|
Looks like the rachet is getting cranked (by the USA).
|
brewens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. "Went to a mosque, gonna throw some rocks |
|
put the Ayatolla into a wooden box" the lyrics I remember from that song.
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Obama will not bomb Iran. |
|
Thank god he's no George W. Bush.
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yesterday Obama signaled that he may bypass the UN and take direct |
|
action against Iran.
Sound familiar?
|
Cali_Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Actions including additional, targeted sanctions |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Do you actually think because |
|
bushcheneyrove bombed Iraq that President Obama is going to bomb Iran?
I know you've been insinuating it.
|
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-11-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. no, sounds paranoid. sounds like you'll do mental backflips to feed your poutrage.... |
|
obama = bush!11!11 elevens!!11!1!
:eyes:
|
Robb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-11-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Hekate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Don't think so. You have sources, maybe? |
Lord Helmet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-10-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
proteus_lives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-11-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. People here have been claiming that an attack on Iran is right around the corner.. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |