|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 04:51 PM Original message |
Kerry on FCC Court Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bush packed this court with pro-fascism judges. The RW faithful have no clue all their pet issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Damn those fascists and their corporatist agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. none of the three judges in this case were appointed by chimpy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluethruandthru
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. He needs to get to work and give the FCC authority over broadband. ASAP. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. YES, thank you, blue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluethruandthru
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. A little too much jerking of the knees! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. PLEASE STOP CURSING COURTS! They do their jobs, well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. It's easier to see whose side you're on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. CUT IT OUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. CAN YOU STOP TYPING IN ALL CAPS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Deleted message |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. here, i'll post all in lower case: you don't know what you're talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. yep. really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. "But feel free to ignore this and remain uninformed." Get over yourself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I'll take that as a "Yep, I'm happy to be an uniformed ranter." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Take it any way you want to if it makes you feel intelligent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. I' m rubber, you're glue, etc etc etc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I know, I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. And you don't know what you're talking about, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. You went from shouting that this would require an act of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. There MAY be other approaches, and I'm glad some are thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. This court had/has an AGENDA - it's STACKED with corporatists. There's nothing FAIR or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I'm a lawyer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. That doesn't change the FACT that Bush stacked this court with pro-corporate activist judges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. that doesn't change the FACT that your "fact" is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Thanks so much, onenote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. And the ones that tipped the balance to the corporatists were put there by Bush2. STACKED court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. two of the three judges named by chimpy to the DC Circuit replaced Reagan appointees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. eh...the current crop so far seem to be bolder advocates for the corporatist agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. One Judge Tatel decision, against BushCo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. judge tatel is a distinguished former civil rights and education lawyer/activist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I agree, and I'm thrilled to hear from you, onenote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. the 3-judge panel that decided this case wasn't stacked with bush appointees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Evidently, as Senator Kerry points out, that's not the only option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I'm glad to see that SOMEONE is doing some THINKING about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. reality check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. "but I wouldn't bet on it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. you want to bet on it? I'm game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Here's the thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 09:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Senator Kerry's statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. I was disappointed in the decision today, but I agree with Senator Kerry, the FCC should continue to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC