|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 07:51 AM Original message |
| Florida House debating LIVE whether women must have an ultrasound before having an abortion |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hobbit709
|
Fri Apr-30-10 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Can we demand a brain scan of the legislators |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Guess this the Republican party's 'less government' philosophy in action. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dr.Phool
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 14. No neuron activity there. However, there's a shitload of moron activity. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| katmondoo
|
Fri Apr-30-10 07:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. I have my Florida licence plate that says CHOICE |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 6. Awesome! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. Would this doctor lie to us and say an ultrasound is required before performing an abortion? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tanyev
|
Fri Apr-30-10 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Let me guess....most of the people having this debate are men? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Yes, altho there was one Hispanic woman speaking in favor and exaggerating number of those who've |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 13. And, it's all done under the disingenuous guise of 'protecting' women-keeping them safe. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. Got distracted. So, can a woman opt out of having an ultrasound or not. What's going on here? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| newfie11
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. So how many women are there to support this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:30 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. There are Republican women both supporting and opposing this bill. Don't know the numbers though. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Sentinel blog: House debating what could produce one of the toughest anti-abortion bills in the US |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. Bear in mind these 'small government' Republican yahoos run our great state! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. It's not a mandate to require an ultrasound if abortion's an elective procedure? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jennicut
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. They will make the women who want the abortion pay for it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. They sure as hell are! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hepburn
|
Fri Apr-30-10 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. Assholes... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Rep. Roberson says again this is an unfunded mandate and abortion decision should stay between woman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 25. They are against unfunded mandates when it is about the federal govt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KingFlorez
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. "Stand down if you don't have ovaries" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. Yes! Let's be honest here. This amendment is not to protect women, but to discourage abortion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 23. Rep. Kriseman says exactly this and this amendment is being offered to repeal to the Republican base |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Puzzler
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. All the pols in the house are doctors, right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| political_Dem
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. Here we go again. Men deciding for women when it has to do with reproduction. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hepburn
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. Abortion would be a sacrament if men could get pregnant. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. Are there any other surgical procedures that the government mandates how they must be performed? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. There are no laws which require an ultrasound before any other medical procedure. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. A Republican Dr. whose against this bill as an 'intrusion of government into practice of medicine.' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| and-justice-for-all
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. Pure manipulation.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. Yep. Good point from Dem Rep. Rader that they're spending last day of session on this and not jobs! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. Rep Stargel, this is not about disclosure, this is about discouraging women from having an abortion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Orsino
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 33. How about a literacy test, instead? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 34. Machines locked for quorum call. Vote coming shortly. Bill expected to pass. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. Bil passes 72 to 46. Now, will Crist veto, sign into law, or let become law w/o signature? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. The Florida Senate passed this ultrasound mandate for an abortion yesterday by a 26-13 vote. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueIris
|
Fri Apr-30-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 40. Yet more evidence that Florida is beyond the reach of democracy. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. SPT Buzz blog comments on the passage of this bill... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| flpoljunkie
|
Fri Apr-30-10 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Postonpolitics: Charlie Crist has 'concerns' over the abortion bill just passed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dappleganger
|
Fri Apr-30-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 39. He's lining things up for a veto. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 10th 2026, 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC