|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:24 PM Original message |
How can anyone here even think the Enquirer story has any truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh, it has some truth ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ahh...it's the same ole Republican shit..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
40. Actually, it didn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. There has been an undercurrent of racism since PO began to run... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #42 |
50. I am with you I hope I see it in my lifetime too!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Submariner
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. It has the smell of Rove all over it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Wow. That center shot is the best pic of Rove I have ever seen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. People posting it simply don't *care* whether or not it's true. Looking bad for Obama is enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gleaner
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think that much of anything that the Enquirer ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 09:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
71. Any publication as obsessed with alien babies as the NE is doesn't get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's a stupid story that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. No, I saw them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. You rant with the best, my dear ras! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
9. They seem to be saying that he did it while he was POTUS. I doubt that. But it's possible they had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. They know they can bring down a President with a sex scandal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 08:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Except they didn't bring down Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. He was impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 10:41 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. And there lies all of the difference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. Isn't this thing four years old? If there was anything there there.. they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rury
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
69. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
72. Six years old. So a RW'er is willing to pay $$$ to somebody for bad stuff on the President and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'll believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. Fabricated from whole cloth, printed in a rag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
15. I had already forgotten about it before I clicked on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fadedrose
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. Didn't Obama say that he didn't approve of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 09:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
73. I think Sasha said "but Daddy already has Mommy" or something to that effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Morbius
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. I offer one reason to disbelieve it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. +100..well said..he may be the POTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. MO is a striking woman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I don't mean to imply that I believe for a second in any smutty tales re the Obamas, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I'm sorry if that is what was implied... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Same outlet that gave us Bush is having an affair with Condi, while Mrs Bush turned to drink and ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. j edgar had fashion sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #33 |
49. You know, just the mental pic of him in dress is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Morbius
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. I understand what you are saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
56. Not all modern marriages consider "cheating" a bad thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. We like to think we hold high officials to a higher standard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. It's not a higher standard, it's a different standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #19 |
51. Yes! It's in the eyes nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. "why go out for meatloaf when you have steak at home" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 06:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
37. Best reason to disbelieve: "They are searching for the video. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. PLUS, I've never witnessed two people more OBVIOUSLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
21. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
one_voice
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. Is this the Vera Baker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. GOP desperation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Precisely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 11:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. The Joseph Goebbels playbook, AKA Faux news' SOP manual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
29. People think Obama is too good to be true. I don't believe the enquirer. They're just out to get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yet, R's can cheat on their spouses with impunity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
31. Just remind them of the story the Enquirer did about Palin's affair with hubby's business partner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Sat May-01-10 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
32. The fact that we're even mentioning it is all they wanted. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
34. Unless other, more reputable sources back this up, I give this story the credibility... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. Reminds me of the Michelle Obama "whitey" tape that strangely never surfaced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
60. It *does* smack of the "whitey tape" nonsense, doesn't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
36. Deleted message |
mstinamotorcity
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
38. I don't believe any of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
44. Nothing surprises me anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
45. or repeat it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
46. I'm surprised a certain DUer ain't spammin' the forum! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
48. BS that every bit of attention given to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
52. because some people around here really dislike Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Bingo!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
55. I think it might very well be true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sun May-02-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. I don't like to condemn those unless there is proof beyond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
62. It's the Enquirer. When have they gotten anything right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Besides Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. And Tiger... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
64. Oh, some folks just want to spread Edwards' smarminess around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
65. Uhhmmm How did you miss all the NE Condi/Bush stories? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mariawr
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
66. Fox Republicans' new book.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rury
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
68. It's a bullshit story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Tue May-04-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
70. George W Bush did have a sex scandal to some degree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC