|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 01:27 PM Original message |
I hope Obama has the chance to confront the accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. It was too slow, he should admit it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Here's a timeline. Tell me what's too slow about this reaction, thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. His personal response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. So it's been proven BP hid the truth from Obama and the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Oh okay, BP told the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. And why is it so tough for you to agree that it started out in one state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. And they hid the escalation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I asked you if they hid it in #17 and you didn't answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. So you have the info that they lied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. I just read down on the timeline and saw the date they were called out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 01:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. What Obama was handed was a like a call from an old girlfriend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kdillard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 01:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Tell me about it. I don't know how the response could have been any better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. If she was a known liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Crude but effective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
47. "....where she says "I missed my period" when what she really should have said was "my water broke." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Feel free. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. S&S, you should come back and explain. Most of us have seen the timeline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I did, see above n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I thought your complaint was that the administration didn't respond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I responded to the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. So your complaint is about Obama personally. OIC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Let's see. Banks, PhRMA, Toyota, GM, Massey, BP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. BP made the mess. Let them take care of it. As the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Our resources have been tied up since day one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Again, how would have being quicker to doubt BP changed any outcomes here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. If BP is doing just fine, let them keep doing it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Perhaps we should start a petition to have the WH contact S&S |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Like I said, he's in the Gulf, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Is it your contention that the president wouldn't have gone anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. What?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. That's what I thought of your inital response. So I guess we're even? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. But I bet you can't name one finite thing he could have done that would have made a difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Not believed the BP bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Like I said, not one finite thing that would have made a difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. We now have an incident commander |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. The military was on this from DAY ONE. An incident commander isn't going to make a difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. An incident commander makes a huge difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. So what plethora of superpowers does this magic incident commander have to contain a massive spill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Oh honestly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Thats great, but it doesn't answer my question. What superpowers will be used? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Clearly you didn't read the press conference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Did the IC illustrate an ability to suck all the oil out of the gulf in a single breath at the conf? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. It wasn't too slow, and he's talking about it RIGHT NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justgamma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. Yeah, he should have just dove in there and looked for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
46. It was not too slow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. The corporatemediawhores try anything they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. Nowhere, as usual. Halliburton's cememt job might have lead to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
27. This is such a non-issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
43. There are some people for whom nothing is ever enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-02-10 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
50. UNrec'ing -- NOT because of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Sep 21st 2024, 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC