|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:54 PM Original message |
If Obama were a conservative.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
countingbluecars
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. BS n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Deleted sub-thread |
underpants
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. He is smart, has a large group of effective people, and he ... GOVERNS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. If President Obama is a conservative, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Obama is a conservative- just not a "conservative" (reactionary) from the 21st Century |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Rockefeller Republicans weren't all bad- though I'd have prefered traditional Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. As compared to... when? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I can't help you if you have a short memory- or decline to recognize the construct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Memory has nothing to do with it, but it at least provides a frame of reference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I gave you a hometown frame of reference with Hatfield & Packwood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Packwood was a republican who liked to abuse women. Bad example of just about anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:53 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. I'm talking about policy matters- and attitudes, belief and values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. That's utter nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 10:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
46. Deleted sub-thread |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama is ideologically liberal, but he doesn't let his ideology prevent him from getting stuff done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I see very little evidence of that- and considerable evidence to the contrary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. His own voting record and his ideology as expressed in his books are evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Numerous public statements and positions on the issues express the contrary in real life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. That's the supporting evidence for your claim that Obama is a "Rockefeller Republican"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Of course it is- though it makes no sense to bang one's head against a brick wall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. "a poster who's unwilling and/or incapable of engaging in objective analysis on the matter." Like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. That statement expresses precisely what happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Who knew "luck" was objective analysis? That's deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Probability is quite objective- though one would have to study science to get that point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. What does one have to study to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. By your criteria, no one is a liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Not sure where that came from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
61. You mean, like his votes to fund the wars and his FISA vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
12. A conservative, no, but perhaps to the right of a moderate Republican of an earlier era, and even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. Nope; Conservative David Brooks praised HCR; it's a conservative's dream legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
51. and the rest of the conservatives hated it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. Excuse me, but Obama himself stated he was in fact a "New Democrat" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #20 |
57. And "New Democrat" is just another name for "Corporatist" - unfortunately. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
22. Obama is a pragmatic politician governing from where he has to...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. Obama is a Clinton type Democrat. Socially liberal. A pragmatist. Which is fine with me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalun D
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
29. Take Off Your Corporate Media Obama Blinders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. +10000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 10:45 AM Response to Reply #29 |
62. Well done - it's excrutiating but true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. You are confusing Conservative with Fascist Reactionary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Deleted message |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. Bingo. Obama's not a teabagger, just a run-of-the-mill conservadem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #30 |
52. Of course. It's the only way to make this clumsy bit of sophistry work. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. I guess if one is on an extreme, everybody looks like the other side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. You are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
40. The premise that he's a conservative is absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
45. If the OP were a strawman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. A straw scottsman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
53. there are people on this very thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:10 AM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Including me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:25 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I think we have different definitions of "conservative" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Obviously. And yours is dead wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
![]() |
Sat May-08-10 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
48. It depends where you are on that old political spectrum. If you are to the ultra right Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
49. politics isn't graded on a curve. It's not enough to be a bit better than a conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
50. He is more progressive than most of the self-proclaimed "progressives" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:29 AM Response to Reply #50 |
58. Actually, his "reforms" are mostly smoke and mirrors, designed to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. And with that, we completely depart reality... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
60. Deleted message |
niceypoo
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
63. Your mistaking republican for conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC