|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:42 PM Original message |
Glenn Greenwald responds to false claim that he worked from Goldman Sachs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh my. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. So he was on the payroll of Goldman-Sachs via his corporate tool law firm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. But didn't you see his anti-Goldman Sachs links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Ultimately, Greenwald has sided with corporations like Goldman Sachs via his support for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You falsely state Greenwald supports Citizens United's "personhood" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. "sympathetic" = weasel word... Anyone who argues in favor of Citizens United is only... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. My liberal principles are the reason why I sometimes disagree my center-left President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Plus...why did Greenwald side against Boeing in Binyam Mohammed's lawsuit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. "If I were a Wall Street Shill, " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. You misunderstood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Do you know Greenwald? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Hmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubledamerican
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Hilarious -- you think Greenwald has nothing better to do than waste time on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Well, he has enough time to waste e-mailing people about claims made on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubledamerican
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. You continue to insinuate that the poster is Greenwald -- really??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. I'm doing no such thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #50 |
65. I found that in wikipedia. Ever heard of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. A guy who supports Citizen's United distorting Kagan's position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Do you agree with the points Greenwald made againt Goldman Sachs amd the bailout? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Citizens United. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Goldman Sachs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. He's got ties to both. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Why did he slam Goldman Sachs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 08:24 AM Response to Reply #16 |
63. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Deleted message |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. So much fo transparency and change, Mr. Greenwald. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. How is he a WS shill when he slammed their bailout and Goldman Sachs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That wasn't an answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Does this mean you'll be actively campaigning for Obama to be replaced in 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. Deleted message |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. The minute a criticism is proffered, the smear machine starts up, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Greenwald supports Citizens United. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I saw that the first ten times you posted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. "but understand the constitutional basis for his agreement with it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I disagree with him, but that does not translate into personal hatred... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. "personal hatred"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Disagree with you on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
55. Exactly. Greenwald is a corporatist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. You don't know what Kagan's views are on Citizens United, and neither do we! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Why do you hate our freedoms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Deleted message |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I am not sure the intent is to convince anyone of anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Agreed -- the real intent is simply to obfuscate issues and to wear down critics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. And to stir up rancor and division. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. lol! Facts = "smear machine"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. If someone else worked for a firm that represented Goldman, that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. And what is your evidence for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
40. Thanks for the post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
42. Whereas Obama took in close to a million bucks in campaign contributions from GS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Is that all? That's quite a bit less than what he got from the University of California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 05:06 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. True -- MUCH was made of those small individual donations. The huge corporation ones like GS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. GS donations were small individual donations as well, made by employees but was less than U. of CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortune
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #53 |
66. Why haven't you pointed out that Greenwald often defends poor defenseless victims? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
44. You should encourage Mr. Greenwald to register and hang out here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Yeah, then he can debate his support for Citizens United. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. He can also explain why he worked for a corporate tool law firm. Why should we trust him now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 08:12 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. Really? I am quite sure that the vast majority of DU'ers can see right through your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
48. I do have to address two things here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. Stop being so sensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
60. It's been interesting to watch, that's for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 08:27 AM Response to Reply #48 |
64. Thanks for the injection of sanity into the smear stream. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun May-09-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
49. Deleted message |
Vinnie From Indy
![]() |
Mon May-10-10 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
61. Greenwald is one of the best bloggers on the Internet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC