ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 11:33 AM
Original message |
| Cool health care reform time line from AFL-CIO |
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
still may be a bit hard for the teabaggers to 'get it'.
|
DrToast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. They're busy looking for death panels on it.* |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. And SOME of the 9/23 provisions are already in effect... |
|
... children covered until age 26 by most insurers.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. It's a shame about all the people who will die between now and 2014. |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Think ahead to 9/23/10 and imagine all the kids who will live. n/t |
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. It's a shame there's not a date that tells us when we'll all be guraranteed access to care |
|
not just "coverage".
Like people in civilized countries have.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. Yes, whatever happened to the plan that covered everybody immediately? |
|
You know, the Utopian plan that would simply print money during the worst recession since the Great Depression?
Do you know what happened to that plan?
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. You know - the plan that would have started expanding Medicare to more groups |
|
Edited on Wed May-12-10 12:54 PM by dflprincess
Strange how every other developed country manages to provide their citizens access to health care but when it's suggested the U.S. do the same, the idea is slammed as being "utopian".
If the U.S. can afford to pay the private insurers billions in the form of subsidized premiums - it could afford to start expanding Medicare.
If Obama thinks we can afford to escalate in Afghanistan during the "worst recession since the Great Depression", there is no reason he shouldn't have thought we could afford health care - something that would have helped Americans during the "worst recession since the Great Depression".
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. The citizens of the nation should be given first priority and I can't |
|
think of anything more important than life or death issues. Money was shipped to Wall Street by the boat loads, but the uninsured are still lining up at Remote Area Medical events. I guess it's easy to dismiss those in need of medical care if you yourself have access to it.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. Any estimate on the number who would have died if we descended into a worldwide depression? |
|
Edited on Wed May-12-10 03:03 PM by HughMoran
Millions?
Billions?
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 18. Any estimate on those who wouldn't have died if we hadn't continued |
|
to funnel money by the billions into Iraq and Afghanistan? If we didn't have 100 military bases scattered all over the world? There's plenty of money available for social issues, but social issues don't generate profits for big business so it's easier to let people die of diseases that might not be terminal if you lived in Great Britain, Canada, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, France and a host of other countries.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. You'll get no argument from me about the milititary industrial complex |
|
Edited on Wed May-12-10 04:45 PM by HughMoran
...and I admire your 'kitchen sink' approach - eventually something will stick.
BTW, people in those countries do pay for their coverage, albeit it's much more efficient than our system! I'm all for it; sadly - it'll be a long time coming here so we're going to have to deal with what we have and continue fighting for incremental changes as many of those countries did to get the system they have today.
|
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. That is good but there must be a lot more items than that? |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. I'd give Joe Liebermann or Ben Nelson or Evan Bayh or Blanch Lincoln or Mary Landrieu a call |
|
They might be able to fill you in...
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Oooo! Print, Copy and Post around Town!. . .n/t |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. This is a Great Start..I appreciate what we have |
|
now and can build on. This will help our economic structure too.
|
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. A question about pre-existing conditions.... |
|
The timeline gives "Coverage for pre-existing conditions" as soon as the bill is signed. Then in the "by 2014" category, there's "Total ban on pre-existing condition denials". Obviously, therefore, the immediate "coverage" isn't total. Would someone who's familiar with the bill explain what happens immediately in this respect? I have a suspicion that it has something to do with the high-risk pools, but I don't have a clear picture of whether those will offer genuinely affordable coverage, beginning immediately, to people with pre-existing conditions.
Thanks for any light anyone can shed!
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 17. Kids with preexisting conditions can't be denied insurance now |
|
Whether or not they will be able to actually get care will depend on how much "coverage" the parent can afford.
The ban on denying adults with preexisting conditions insurance kicks in in a few years with no guarantee they'll actually be able to access care either.
|
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-12-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. Thanks! That's helpful. |
|
I agree with you that there are major unanswered questions about what kind of insurance coverage people will actually be able to obtain (considering premiums, co-pays, and deductibles), as well as the more important question about what kind of health care they'll actually receive.
|
hughee99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-13-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
| 21. No mention of 2018 when the "cadillac plan" exemption ends? n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |