|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:08 PM Original message |
Why the fuck would Sestak even say the White House tried to offer him a job. What a dumbass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. because he was angry that.. obama was backing spector.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
77. How dare he back the incumbent democrat, a little uppity if you ask Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #77 |
99. Specter was never a Democrat. He was an opportunist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. How could any one here back Specter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. I suspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. "And now CNN is all over this. They're calling it a bribe." Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. For the past 2 days, they've had segments on it. At Gibbs got hammered at the briefing 2day over it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. "This isn't going away. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Hello?!! It doesn't make HIM look bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. OK, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
98. Its already gone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. They're calling it a bribe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. A bribe would be business as usual. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yeppers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Good point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. If they did then why should he lie about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Nobody asked him about it. Nobody is asking him to lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Maybe this WH needs to learn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Go2Peace
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
95. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Just Seems To Me That This Issue Is In Retaliation To The Rand Paul Civil Rights Issue...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. You think he should STFU? Why? What does he owe them? They did squat for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No, they did less than squat they supported his rival (a former Republican, before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. WTF is wrong with you people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Were asking why the President didn't support a real Democrat, not one that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. That's not the topic of this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Your damn right it is! Sestak owes this Administration absolutely nothing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. But you are not Sestak, and he is going to support the President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. And your point is? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Pretty clear. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Whatever, I have my opinion and you have yours, we'll leave it at that! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
41. Then why is everyone upset that Sestak is admitting the WH offered him an appointment to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. "Why does the OP say Sestak should STFU? " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Well some think it is an issue that Setak admitted he was offered an appointment to drop out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Whoosh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. There ARE more important things than the President. I think those who do not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
66. Real talk! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. It seems like some do want him to damage Obama. Him winning should be revenge enough. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I think you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Specter is just another Republican in sheeps clothing that doesn't no where he belongs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. This came out forever ago. He hadn't won so this is not about revenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. Why should the president try to damage a Dem?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
39. Are you really saying it was okay for the President to support a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
80. Offering a job is an ethics violation? Whoo boy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Oh really? Why don't you ask Rod Blagojevich how well that "hunts". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:52 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Selling for cash is not the same thing as an offer. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:50 PM Response to Reply #80 |
89. He wasn't offering a job. He was asking for an exchange. The job was only offered as part of an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. So where's the proof and in what context? I haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
61. Here is the context and Sestak DID say this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. Sometimes I wonder which of the two major parties are more self-destructive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. No, the Dems aren't even close. Everyone is human |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
76. I'd like to agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Sure there's lots of dinos...but on the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. Because it's the truth. What? We are supposed to be immoral? Anything for a win? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
44. At some point, you just need to go to the other side! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Oh come on? I despise the GOP. But the truth is what being a democrat is about : VALUES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Offering a job is somehow immoral? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I'm not doing the spinning, the media is. Sestak merely told the truth. That is not a sin. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. What was done that was immoral? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. You misunderstand. People are attacking Sestak for telling the truth. His values not Obama's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:44 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. No, actually I saw that Rick Sanchez piece..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Actually the WH offering an appointment to a sitting congressman running for the Senate in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
68. I wasn't watching Rick Sanchez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
62. This wasn't just "offering a job" Jeebus, you accept anything! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #48 |
79. He was offered the job to get him to stay out of the PA race, then yes it was immoral. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
35. CNN are the dumbasses. If you offer your kids candy to do/not do something that's a "bribe" too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
37. Because it was true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
38. So Bush can lie to the American Public and Congress and get us into a war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickwithobama
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is going to be the new "Whitewater." They were waiting for Sestak to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. If They start in on this petty bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. So you REALLY think this shouldn't be a story? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #65 |
86. hey, it's you, grasping at any straw that threatens Obama, again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Deleted message |
kjackson227
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
42. I see articles that were printed regarding this back in February... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
67. Because Issa is demanding an investigation and because Sestak has not recanted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:30 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. ~SIGH~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
51. You don't even know what was offered or when or how or why or if.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Are you talking to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. No. Op writer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Okay :)... I really think this is "silly season" on DU for the past... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Aye! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Yeah we do. Sestak told us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:04 PM Response to Reply #64 |
75. if this is true--Obama brought it on himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
58. The man won the election. This means 'not a dumbass' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. Yup. And the WH gave the GOP their talking points on this .Issa is NOT going to shut up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
70. I, for one, am glad this is out there as public knowledge. Is this how we want our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
howaboutme
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
71. The question is - is it right or wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
73. WHO CARES. Another DU tempest in a Teapot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. But Sestak ALSO says Obama offered him a big appointment to withdraw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
83. Quid pro quo. If you do this, then we'll do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. Exactly.Sestak did the right thing . If this bites the WH in the ass, he is in the clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robeson
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #83 |
101. You're using logic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
84. This story is 4 months old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. Because the GOP was waiting to see if Sestak got the nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
85. They can call it that all they want, but there's nothing wrong with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:56 PM Response to Reply #85 |
91. Rationalize anything can't you? A high ranking Federal position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 11:39 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. No worse than when Nixon offered John Sirica a job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
87. Not surprised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Morbius
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
92. Woah. What are we saying, here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Big difference asking a sitting elected official to effect the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #94 |
97. i have read every reply on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NHDEMFORLIFE
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #92 |
102. Finally, someone states the simple truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz
![]() |
Sat May-22-10 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
103. This story CAME OUT IN FEBRUARY. Everyone in PA knows about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC