|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:41 AM Original message |
I knew it was coming. Morning Joe and co is implying the WH broke the law by bribing Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. With respect, if democrats would stop watching that smarmy show, they'd go off of the air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Save your keystrokes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. I know, I know, and I'm one of your worst offenders but let me try to defend us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Issa, Rep. has been on this since the comment was first made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
3. Actually Pat Puke Cannon said Sestak "is going to have to walk the cat back" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Sestak has issues. I liked him at first, but he kinda seems like an asshole. He should've known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. I agree. His acceptance speech was a real turnoff for me. And now this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. I doubt that this is going away and will probably become larger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fugop
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. We'll see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyAndProud60
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. That impeachment helped Bush get elected. NT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fugop
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Except ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Of the two lessons, I think that while I agree with the second, in this case it is an overstatement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
11. Sestak was really friggin stupid to say what he did. Just dumb. The WH would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. The VOTERS are supposed to decide who represents them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Yes, how stupid of him to tell the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. I doubt it, but we shall see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Honesty trumps lies every day of week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
12. Broke What Law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestRick
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. It's a crime... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. What law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Seriously ... SOMEONE post the LAW ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
42. Not gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. I seriously doubt it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Please cite the US Code section |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. I agree, it may look bad, but I don't see how it breaks the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That Statute Is Not Even Relevant To The Alleged Facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. If someone the WH favored was running for PA governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. No it would not be a violation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Ahhh I was not part of the WH talking to Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. No, I don't think Sestak is lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. If the WH clams up and won't give the content of the conversations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Yes, I'm an attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. What don't you get about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. It doesn't matter who made the offer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. You don't need to lecture me on how to cite U.S. Code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Still wrong wrong wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. You have the advantage of a WH who is taking the Nixonion stonewalling approach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:37 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. "twisting your version of the facts" Lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:40 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. And on your other point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 09:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
53. No law probably broken...it is refusing to admit WH quid pro quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. George Will, no liberal (to say the least) said on "This Week" yesterday that this is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. it certainly smells bad, in as much as George says it's part of politics, we hoped for change in DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yep....Democrats need to stop doing something like offering a job..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 01:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. if that is somehow a defense of offering a job quid pro quo to someone to leave the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Sorry ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
36. Tom Ridge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. No, this is crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioBlue
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
59. you're kidding right? I couldn't have cared less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 09:20 PM Response to Reply #21 |
60. trying to get a genuine Democrat out of the race for a GOP convenience 'convert' smells of Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. The vultures are trying to make it seem bad which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
58. Lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. Unfortunely for the WH Will is not a U.S. prosecutor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. Joe saying that is one of the reasons I voted for Arlen nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiranon
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
40. No crime in saying to Joe that he might be happier in another job given the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greencharlie
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
47. why is illegal to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. It is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Mon May-24-10 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
50. this is the same crap you were peddling last week. nobody's buying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already 2
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
61. Sestak screwed the pooch on this one big time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE1947
![]() |
Tue May-25-10 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
62. Identify Emanuel, remove him, and move on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC