|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 08:40 AM Original message |
What is the rationale for so many Senate Dems rejecting Whitehouse's usury amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. The "owners" don't want it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think you and George Carlin may be on to something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Sometimes the obvious answer is the correct one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
39. WHY? $$$$$$$$$$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 12:01 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. What's really tragic is they sell their political souls so cheaply! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Everyone who voted Nay should have attack ads made against them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkyDaddy7
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 07:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Is that the Bible or Quran? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. The Bible does too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SkyDaddy7
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Thanks! Yes I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
4. My reaction was like yours - I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. What my question is why can't they pass a Federal Regulation on fair rates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I agree that a national law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:26 AM Response to Reply #11 |
37. "the only people protected would be those from progressive states" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
5. MBNA, Bank of America, etc. have paid them ALL off. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
6. Finally, bi-partisanship! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yep, they are both whores of the banks and financiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. And, replaced with what? We must hold Dems feet to the fire, and try to get more people involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Smash the duopoly to the ground! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 11:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. We have two 'Fair Districts' amendments on the ballot here in FL in November. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
47. Maria has been voting against some of the bankster bullshit lately, but not this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. I would love to hear their rationale for voting against Whitehouse's amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. Maybe because they don't want to block credit to many people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 12:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Credit card companies make egregious profits off the backs of those least able to afford their rates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. So if there are credit unions, what's the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 07:39 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Problem is banks make egregious profits on credit card rates from those who can least afford it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 08:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. 29.99%. That's my current rate on my *only* card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 08:10 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Great point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. If you level the playing field, there'll still be credit available |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
15. They are all owned by the Corporate Elite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The answer is voter participation or public financing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. As candidate Barack Obama once said, 'We are the ones we've been waiting for.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 07:49 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. More like, "We are the ones whom the corporate elites love to rob of every last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. You say "commit that you won't donate to the campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Jun-01-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
63. You can check to see who has cosponsored the Fair Elections Now Act--153 in House, 20 in Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sat May-29-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. DemoCons against it for the same reason as RepliCons: Filthy Lucre.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmedem
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
23. I'm puzzled that Dodd voted nay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 07:51 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. You're puzzled Mr.. 4% CountryWide loan of 2002 voted "nay?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 08:18 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. The facts on Senator Dodd's Countrywide loan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
42. Reddest of red herrings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. Dodd is the dumbest politician I've ever met. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 06:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. I was surprised to not see Holy Joe on the list myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
30. You're still buying into the demonstrably false myth that the Democratic Party, as a whole, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 09:29 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. No, not really, but the R's are always on the side of Big Banks, Big Oil, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
34. A little history on South Dakota's and Delaware's involvement in the 'credit card bidness' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
35. Both my senators voted 'Yea' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I was a bit surprised with Feinstein, as well. Kaufman, of course, is a senator from Delaware--one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
41. Speaking of Big Banks's influence, a must read from Michael Lewis, author of 'The Big Short' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. Because wouldn't it also give states the right NOT to protect consumers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 05:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. This federal law enabled unscrupulous states to work with big banks to screw consumers in all states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 08:30 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. All state laws would have to be better than the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laylah
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
49. I remember usery laws... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 07:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. When bank lobbyists can legally bundle contributions for members of Congress, their money speaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Sun May-30-10 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. Sanders should sponsor his own version - again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. He definitely will, if given the opportunity. We need more Bernie Sanders in the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 08:54 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. That is the bill that needs to pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 09:33 AM Response to Reply #54 |
55. They both need to pass. We need to take back our democracy from the big monied interests. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Both? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. If we financed their campaigns, they would not be beholden to big banks. Congress could do both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. No, they conflict, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Agree. Sanders' bill does not preclude state from further protections. Am talking public financing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Mon May-31-10 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
60. A majority of Democratic senators voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie
![]() |
Tue Jun-01-10 09:22 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Not good enough. Way too many voted against it. Twenty Democrats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Tue Jun-01-10 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
61. Because they are corrupt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Jun-01-10 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
64. The Law of Unintended Consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC