dave29
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 12:59 AM
Original message |
| MSNBC Breaking: USDA to reconsider ouster of official Shirley Sherrod over race comments |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Good news. Now, let's undo the damage and see if Breitbart can be charged with libel. |
|
No question there was malice and deliberate falsification.
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Someone's head should roll for terminating her without all the facts in the first place. |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
There should be a rebuke and probably minor policy changes on grievance and whatnot, but I don't see why the actual operation of the USDA should be disturbed over this.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Yes.....Breidhard's head should roll, |
|
and we should be the one to knock it off its block.
Some folks made a mistake, and should apologize, but other folks conspired to start this fraudulent shit.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Libel with malicious intent. Spread the word. nt |
golfguru
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. EXACTLY!!! ding ding ding |
|
How the hell can they terminate a career employee of USDA without any basic analysis of facts? No investigation, no vetting, just fire from the hips? Unreal.
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. Absolutely! Others here seem to have low expectations for the people who decided to fire her without |
|
investigation.
That doesn't mean brietbart shouldn't eat crow too. And so should Faux news.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 9. So, IOW, FIRE Someone ELSE, So Breitbart And Fox STILL WIN? |
|
Yeah. Good idea. Way to do exactly what Breitbart and Fox want. :eyes:
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. False premise - it doesn't mean breitbart would "WIN" It means TWO parties are at fault here. |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. Sure It Does, If Someone Gets Fired, Mission Accomplished, In Fact They've Already Won |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 11:55 AM by Beetwasher
No one's talking about their lies, it's now attack Obama time all the time.
Breitbart and Fox have dissappeared from the story and now everyone is in full attack Obama mode.
Good job guys, circular firing squad commence.
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. Your concern is duly noted. n/t |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. Why Stop There? FIRE EVERYONE!!!! |
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. For the love of GOD, Reinstate ASAP with full pay...... CNN = Evil |
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-21-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
| 10. she'd make a good Sec. of Agriculture n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 10th 2026, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |